• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Ex-president Rouhani could face death penalty, MP fulminates

Sep 18, 2025, 20:27 GMT+1Updated: 00:38 GMT+0
Iran's former President Hassan Rouhani
Iran's former President Hassan Rouhani

Former president Hassan Rouhani could face the death penalty if charges against him are proven in court, an Iranian lawmaker said on Wednesday, reviving threats against an architect of a 2015 nuclear deal loathed by hardliners.

“Some of the accusations are at the level of spreading corruption on earth, and if the court proves them, his punishment will be execution,” Kamran Ghazanfari said in an interview with Iran24, referring to a formal charge in the theocracy's law.

“He has already inflicted enough damage and loss on the country. One example is the nuclear deal, which was entirely a loss. He took pride in it.”

The remarks suggest increasing tension within Iran's ruling establishment as geopolitical uncertainty festers following a 12-day war with Israel in June, new international sanctions loom and economic hardship bites.

Ghazanfari said the previous parliament filed eight complaints against Rouhani which were all forwarded to the judiciary. He accused judiciary chief Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei of failing to act, despite a legal obligation to give such cases priority.

“Was Rouhani tried? Was he punished or not? If so, explain. If not, explain why he has not been tried and punished.”

Ghazanfari also referred to another case sent to the judiciary by late President Ebrahim Raisi’s government, accusing Rouhani of involvement in the disappearance of 48 valuable carpets from the Saadabad Palace.

Former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani
100%
Former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani

Rouhani’s office at the time rejected the allegation as a political distraction.

Criticism of nuclear deal

Ghazanfari again attacked the nuclear agreement, calling it “entirely a loss.”

“Rouhani should remain silent, rest at home, and not enter such matters,” he said, arguing that when no legal action is taken “He dares to talk big.”

His comments come as Britain, France, and Germany have triggered the nuclear deal’s snapback mechanism against Iran. Western governments have set conditions, including granting the International Atomic Energy Agency access to enriched uranium stockpiles, with a deadline at the end of September.

Under Resolution 2231, sanctions will automatically return after 30 days unless the Security Council votes otherwise.

Rouhani defends dialogue

Rouhani has re-emerged in recent weeks to call for reducing confrontation with the West, including the United States.

“Relations with Europe, our neighbors, and the East and the West, even tension with the US, if we can reduce it, if it is in our national interest, what is wrong with that? Not only is it not wrong, but it is also our duty and obligation,” he told advisers in late August.

Rouhani argued that Iran should pursue talks if they advance national interests and security. In comments on August 14, he described negotiations with the United States as necessary and obligatory.

His remarks was in apparent conflict with the supreme leader's position who on the same day warned against advocating talks with Washington. “Agents of America and Zionism sought to create division inside Iran,” Khamenei said.

Most Viewed

Iran diplomacy wobbles as factions compete to avoid looking soft on US
1
INSIGHT

Iran diplomacy wobbles as factions compete to avoid looking soft on US

2
VOICES FROM IRAN

Bread shortages, soaring prices strain households in Iran, residents say

3
ANALYSIS

The politics of pink: how Iran uses cuteness to rebrand violence

4

Scam messages seek crypto for ships’ safe passage through Hormuz, firm warns

5
EXCLUSIVE

Family told missing teen was alive, then received his body 60 days later

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Diplomacy tolls at Hormuz as conflict returns to its doorstep
    OPINION

    Diplomacy tolls at Hormuz as conflict returns to its doorstep

  • Opposition to US talks grows in Tehran as ceasefire deadline nears
    INSIGHT

    Opposition to US talks grows in Tehran as ceasefire deadline nears

  • Tehran moderates see ‘no deal–no war’ limbo as worst outcome
    INSIGHT

    Tehran moderates see ‘no deal–no war’ limbo as worst outcome

  • The future has been switched off here
    TEHRAN INSIDER

    The future has been switched off here

  • Lights out, then gunfire: Witnesses recount Mashhad protest crackdown
    VOICES FROM IRAN

    Lights out, then gunfire: Witnesses recount Mashhad protest crackdown

  • Is Iran entering its Gorbachev moment?
    INSIGHT

    Is Iran entering its Gorbachev moment?

•
•
•

More Stories

Unfinished yet irreversible: Iran's Woman, Life, Freedom three years on

Sep 18, 2025, 18:48 GMT+1
•
Jamshid Barzegar

Three years after the killing of Mahsa "Jina" Amini in the custody of Iran’s morality police, and in the shadow of the Islamic Republic’s recent 12-day war with Israel, the outlines of a durable social transformation are clear.

Commentators disagree on labels—uprising, movement, revolution—but most accept that the protests of 2022 and their afterlife have marked a foundational rupture. They drew in multiple strata of society, altered daily life and public discourse and forced the Islamic Republic into retreats that once seemed inconceivable.

The chant “Woman, Life, Freedom,” first voiced at Amini’s burial in the town of Saqqez in Iran's Kurdistan province, condensed demands for autonomy, dignity and equality into three words that spoke across class and region.

A society long fragmented by divide-and-rule tactics has moved toward solidarity. Women and men, Kurds and Persians, Baluch and Azeris, urban and rural citizens stood together in 2022, building a pluralism not seen in recent memory.

The movement challenged not only gender discrimination but the state’s entire normative order, and it did so through radically non-violent means. In compelling the regime to cede ground—above all on the legally-mandated hijab—it achieved changes that would once have been described as revolutionary in themselves.

Inside homes, younger generations have renegotiated relations with parents in ways that blunt the state’s intrusion into private life.

The state’s grip on the streets has been broken; unveiled women now walk freely in Tehran, Mashhad, Shiraz, and countless smaller cities. Equality and bodily autonomy, once dismissed as Western imports, have moved to the center of Iranian discourse.

An even more draconian hijab and chastity law passed by parliament was frozen by Iran's Supreme National Security Council in May out of concern it would spark unrest.

Not easy

But the obstacles remain—and repression is still lethal.

In 2022 at least 552 protesters were killed, thousands more jailed, and executions have mounted since. The ruling elite retain an effective coercive apparatus, even if their confidence has been shaken by war and domestic unrest.

Economically, decades of corruption, sanctions, inflation and environmental degradation have pushed both state and society into survival mode.

Families channel scarce energy into endurance, leaving less room for organized protest. A potential revolution’s strength—its horizontal, decentralized nature—has also limited its ability to produce leadership or coherent organization.

Opposition forces remain fragmented, particularly in the diaspora, and coordination inside Iran has faltered as street protests ebbed.

Even so, the balance of change is striking.

In just three years, the movement has embedded demands that no future order can ignore. Its art, slogans, and public faces have entered common life.

No credible opponent of the regime positions themselves against it; all align with or inherit from it.

Hopes for future

Looking forward, much will depend on four interlinked tasks.

Daily civil resistance appears to be institutionalized, above all the unveiled presence of women in public life.

Economic grievances and livelihood protests have yet to be joined to clear political demands. If and when they are, a broader front against misrule would come to life.

Fragmented opposition forces need to converge on a clearer vision for post–Islamic Republic Iran. And international sympathy must be translated into targeted support that strengthens civil society without dragging it into destructive conflict.

The Islamic Republic’s institutions still stand, but their legitimacy has been stripped to the bone. Voter participation has sunk to historic lows, public trust has collapsed, and governance has narrowed to the sheer mechanics of survival.

Those in power are now fixated on endurance rather than service. In this vacuum, civil society advances on a different track.

Three years on, “Woman, Life, Freedom” remains the principal engine of transformation. Street protests may have wound down, but the changes in culture and imagination look irreversible.

The revolution is unfinished, but it endures in daily defiance, in a pluralist solidarity that defies the state’s order, and in a vision of citizenship rooted in universal rights.

That, already, is an achievement historic in scale—one whose ultimate destination may yet be a secular, democratic Iran.

Snapback sanctions will be imposed on Iran by month’s end, Macron says

Sep 18, 2025, 17:00 GMT+1

Snapback sanctions on Iran will be triggered at the end of this month, French President Emmanuel Macron said in an interview with Israel’s Channel 12 on Thursday.

Asked if the return of UN sanctions on Iran was a "done deal," Macron answered: “Yes, I think so. Because the latest news we have from the Iranians are not serious."

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, he added, “tried to make a reasonable offer” to reach a deal with European powers, but did not receive backing from other members of the Iranian ruling system.

Iran made a new proposal to the E3 nations Britain, Germany and France on Wednesday to avoid the return of UN sanctions, Wall Street Journal journalist Laurence Norman reported on X earlier on Thursday.

The E3 views the proposal as insufficient because it seeks major concessions without any concrete Iranian action, Norman added, citing an unnamed source.

Seperately, Axios journalist Barak Ravid wrote on X that a draft resolution to extend the suspension of UN sanctions on Iran will be circulated at the Security Council on Thursday, with a vote scheduled for Friday.

Barak said the resolution is not expected to pass, which would trigger the “snapback” mechanism, leading to the reimposition of sanctions on Iran at 8 p.m. ET on September 27.

The three European powers triggered the snapback process on August 28 under Resolution 2231, demanding Iran return to talks, grant wider access to inspectors, and account for its missing uranium stockpiles.

On Wednesday, European foreign ministers urged Iran to resume nuclear talks, allow inspections of sensitive sites and curb its stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

Last week, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said that if the E3 move to activate the snapback mechanism to reimpose UN sanctions, "they will be excluded from nuclear negotiations with the Islamic Republic."

Europe unmoved by Iranian proposal to avoid sanctions - WSJ reporter

Sep 18, 2025, 15:56 GMT+1

European states at the center of a sanctions drama with Tehran due for a finale next month deemed an Iranian proposal to gain a reprieve insufficient and overly demanding, a Wall Street Journal reporter said on Thursday.

The E3 - France, Germany and the United Kingdom - last month triggered a mechanism in a 2015 international nuclear deal with Iran to "snapback" international sanctions within 30 days if Tehran does not convince them of its compliance.

“Iran made a new offer to E3 yesterday to avoid snapback, I understand. One which frankly is barely a bit credible. I am not alone in thinking that,” Norman posted on X, going on to cite a source familiar with the matter.

"The E3 regard Iran's latest proposal as insufficient in substance as it demands far-reaching actions like extension of the SnapBack or even complete termination (of 2231) in exchange for Iranian declarations of intent, but without any concrete actions on the Iranian side," he quoted the source as saying.

Norman was referring to the United Nations Security Council resolution number promulgating the nuclear deal which, in the Western view, authorizes the snapback move.

Iran denies seeking a bomb, criticized the US withdrawal from the agreement during President Donald Trump's first term in 2018 and say the European powers lack authority to trigger snapback sanctions because they violated their own commitments to the deal.

Any agreement to extend or avert the restored sanctions must be reached before a October 18 deadline.

The E3 "remain dedicated to diplomacy and ready to engage with Iran at any time, including" at the UN General Assembly meeting in New York next week, Norman quoted the source as saying.

The 80th session of the UN General Assembly opened on September 9, with world leaders beginning to arrive in New York on September 22.

Norman, a veteran watcher of international nuclear diplomacy, paraphrased Iran’s position as “Give us everything we want, and we might give you some of what you want.”

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), signed in 2015 by Iran and the P5+1, the United States, Britain , France, Germany, Russia and China plus the European Union, aimed to curb Iran’s nuclear program in return for sanctions relief.

Dissident Iranian filmmakers urge Oscars to reject state-linked submissions

Sep 18, 2025, 12:27 GMT+1

An association of independent Iranian filmmakers has called on the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) to overhaul how it accepts films from countries under authoritarian rule, warning that the current system legitimizes state-controlled cinema bodies.

In a letter to the Academy this week, the Iranian Independent Filmmakers Association (IIFMA) said the Farabi Cinema Foundation, which oversees Oscar submissions from Iran, enforces censorship and sidelines independent voices at home and abroad.

The group proposed an international committee that could select Iranian films free of government influence, citing the cultural impact of the Woman, Life, Freedom protest movement.

The appeal came a day after Iran announced Ali Zarnegar’s Cause of Death: Unknown as its entry for the 98th Academy Awards.

The selection drew mixed reactions inside Iran, with the hardline daily Javan urging officials to choose a film that reflected “Islamic-Iranian values,” while veteran filmmaker Homayoun Asadian accused state authorities of trying to dictate the choice.

  • France picks Jafar Panahi’s ‘It Was Just An Accident’ as Oscar entry

    France picks Jafar Panahi’s ‘It Was Just An Accident’ as Oscar entry

  • Mahsa Amini’s death sparked irreversible change in Iran, Jafar Panahi says

    Mahsa Amini’s death sparked irreversible change in Iran, Jafar Panahi says

IIFMA argued that acclaimed works such as Jafar Panahi’s Palme d’Or-winning It Was Just an Accident -- which France has submitted this year -- demonstrate the global recognition of Iranian filmmakers when free of state oversight.

Panahi has long been barred from representing Iran, and supporters say his case highlights how government involvement excludes major artists.

Iran has a history of success at the Oscars, with Asghar Farhadi winning best international feature for A Separation (2012) and The Salesman (2017).

Khamenei-linked daily says Afghan expulsions failed to curb bread prices

Sep 18, 2025, 11:19 GMT+1

The Islamic Republic’s mass expulsions of Afghan migrants have not eased Iran’s economic strain nor slowed soaring bread prices, the hardline Kayhan newspaper, overseen by Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, wrote on Wednesday.

“The claim was that Afghan nationals were consuming so much bread that they were pushing prices higher. Yet even after more than 1.5 million have left, the price of Sangak [a popular traditional Iranian bread] has risen fourfold,” the paper said.

“Why should bread prices climb 300 percent compared to 2024 when no major shortage is expected?” the paper asked.

A loaf of subsidized Sangak bread cost 5,000 rials (about $0.05) in September 2024 but now sells for 200,000 rials (about $0.20), marking a 300-percent increase in one year.

Iran’s state news agency IRNA says that in Tehran Sangak priced at 100,000–150,000 rials has effectively disappeared; most customers now pay 200,000–500,000 rials per loaf, with sesame-topped bread commonly around 300,000 (about $0.30).

Official rates diverge from street prices, which vary by neighborhood and bakery. A government task force set a 600-gram sangak at 76,000 rials (about $0.07), but shoppers say loaves at that price are smaller and poorer quality.

Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni argued in August that expulsions reduced bread transactions by six percent, calling this a government achievement. Lower demand would help stabilize supply, he said.

  • Rampant inflation may ignite bread riots in Iran, economist warns

    Rampant inflation may ignite bread riots in Iran, economist warns

  •  Iran sees steep bread price hikes as inflation bites

    Iran sees steep bread price hikes as inflation bites

Deportations tied to security rhetoric

The Islamic Republic intensified deportations in recent months, especially after the 12-day war with Israel, when authorities accused some foreigners, notably Afghans, of working with Mossad. Such allegations have been used to justify expulsions while deflecting blame for economic hardship.

Decades of economic mismanagement, sanctions, and currency collapse have eroded household purchasing power, leaving low-income families most exposed.

“If inflation remains unchecked … Iran could witness a bread riot,” economist Hossein Raghfar told the moderate outlet Rouydad24 earlier this month, warning that inaction could have consequences far beyond the economy.