• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo
TEHRAN INSIDER

Against Iran’s politics of exclusion, pluralism is the point

Tehran Insider
Tehran Insider

Firsthand reports from contributors inside Iran

Dec 24, 2025, 19:25 GMT+0Updated: 20:48 GMT+0

There is a cruel ritual in Iranian opposition politics: some voices abroad constantly interrogate the “purity” of activists inside—why they did not speak more sharply or endorse maximalist slogans, why survival itself looks insufficiently heroic.

What followed the recent detention of several dissidents, including Iranian Nobel Peace laureate Narges Mohammadi, illustrates the phenomenon starkly.

The detention itself was hardly surprising. It was entirely predictable that security forces would crack down on a gathering commemorating a human rights lawyer whose death many suspect was not natural.

What was revealing came afterward.

As debate swirled online over who chanted what at the memorial and which mobile footage proved what—arguments of limited consequence—it gave way to a far uglier spectacle.

A collage circulated featuring more than thirty activists, many of them former political prisoners, some previously tortured, a few still incarcerated. It questioned their credibility, belittled their records, and even deployed openly sexist insults.

Moral inversion

Ironically, the campaign appeared to be driven not by Tehran’s cyber army but by other dissidents—some quite prominent—residing in Europe and the United States. The charge was not collaboration or recantation, but something vaguer and more corrosive: that those targeted were not “radical” enough by the accusers’ measure.

This was not a disagreement over tactics or language. It was a moral inversion. Those who have endured interrogation rooms and solitary confinement were placed on trial by people whose politics have never required them to bear comparable risk.

I was briefly arrested and mistreated in Iran during the widespread protests of 2022—the Woman, Life, Freedom movement that propelled many of these purity police to their current position of influence.

That experience—minor compared with what many others have endured—has nonetheless made political participation more cautious and more difficult, and deepened my appreciation for those who continue to act, speak, and organize inside the country.

Accountability or cruelty?

History offers a familiar rhyme.

During the French Revolution, émigrés who fled abroad did more than oppose events unfolding inside France. From safety, they radicalized the standard of legitimacy itself, denouncing those who remained as insufficiently pure or insufficiently committed.

Distance hardened conviction into absolutism. Survival became evidence of betrayal and bitterness replaced solidarity.

The Iranian version is not identical, but the structure is unmistakable: exile politics rewards clarity, certainty, and denunciation; politics inside the country requires endurance and is shaped by action rather than words.

When the former judges the latter by its own risk-free standards, the result is not accountability but cruelty.

What may be particular to Iranians today is not the instinct to judge from exile, but the speed and savagery with which survival inside the country is treated as a moral flaw. Social media collapses context, erases risk, and turns the language of people still within reach of the state into a referendum on their character.

When even figures whose resistance is beyond dispute are subjected to this logic, the problem is no longer ideological disagreement. It is systemic.

Cherishing plurality

If prison is no longer proof of commitment, if torture earns no moral credit, and if survival itself is suspect, then the line between oppressor and accuser begins to blur.

A politics that demands ever harsher words from those still within reach of the state is not radical. It is parasitic—feeding on risks others are forced to take.

Our grievance with Iran’s theocratic rule is not only repression, but exclusion: the insistence that there is only one legitimate way to think, live, and speak.

The struggle against the Islamic Republic has always been about replacing that narrowness with something more tolerant and plural—something that allows for disagreement, variety, and a fuller expression of life.

Reproducing a different kind of monotone politics, one that polices language and delegitimizes difference, risks undermining that very aspiration.

Most Viewed

The Hormuz get out of jail card turned to a grave
1
OPINION

The Hormuz get out of jail card turned to a grave

2

State media slam Araghchi's Hormuz tweet, say it let Trump claim victory

3
INSIGHT

How Tehran bends its own red lines to boost state rallies

4
INSIGHT

100 days after carnage: Iran economy reels from war, inflation, unemployment

5
PODCAST

Too early to tell who is winning Iran war, experts say

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • A nation in limbo: 100 days after the massacre, has the world moved on?
    INSIGHT

    A nation in limbo: 100 days after the massacre, has the world moved on?

  • 100 days after carnage: Iran economy reels from war, inflation, unemployment
    INSIGHT

    100 days after carnage: Iran economy reels from war, inflation, unemployment

  • The Hormuz get out of jail card turned to a grave
    OPINION

    The Hormuz get out of jail card turned to a grave

  • Too early to tell who is winning Iran war, experts say
    PODCAST

    Too early to tell who is winning Iran war, experts say

  • How Tehran bends its own red lines to boost state rallies
    INSIGHT

    How Tehran bends its own red lines to boost state rallies

  • Iran blackout cripples freelancer, small business incomes
    VOICES FROM IRAN

    Iran blackout cripples freelancer, small business incomes

•
•
•

More Stories

Iran prosecutor calls drug and alcohol crackdown a national security priority

Dec 22, 2025, 10:00 GMT+0

Iran’s chief prosecutor said on Monday that combating drug abuse and alcohol consumption should be treated as a national security priority, arguing that Iran’s adversaries were seeking to exploit social harm to destabilize the country.

“The fight against narcotics and alcoholic beverages must be a priority, because the enemy is using these areas as tools to undermine security and strike at society,” Mohammad Movahedi said at a meeting of senior judiciary officials.

Speaking at a session focused on security and judicial coordination, Movahedi warned that after failing to achieve their aims through military confrontation, Iran’s enemies were shifting toward what he described as efforts to foment social dissatisfaction and ethnic tension.

He stressed the need for vigilance, closer cooperation with the public, and what he called “people-based intelligence” to counter internal threats.

Movahedi also urged tougher action against smuggling and economic corruption, called for stronger border controls including the expansion of X-ray screening at customs points, and highlighted the importance of reducing prison populations through alternatives to incarceration for non-security offenses.

  • Forbidden but flowing: alcohol slips quietly into public life in Iran

    Forbidden but flowing: alcohol slips quietly into public life in Iran

Alcohol is illegal in Iran under Islamic Republic law and carries penalties including fines, flogging and imprisonment, but it is widely consumed.

Despite periodic crackdowns, homemade and smuggled alcohol remains common, particularly in large cities, and alcohol poisoning outbreaks linked to illicit production have repeatedly highlighted the gap between strict legal bans and social reality.

Guards say Israel’s war plan faltered over failure to stir unrest in Iran

Dec 22, 2025, 08:54 GMT+0

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said on Monday that Israel was defeated in the recent 12-day conflict because it failed to trigger unrest inside Iran, despite what its spokesman described as expectations that military strikes would lead to domestic turmoil.

Ali Mohammad Naini, spokesman for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), said Israel and its allies had pursued a dual strategy during the conflict: direct military confrontation alongside efforts to destabilize Iran from within.

“The enemy’s defeat in the 12-day war was precisely here,” Naini said. “They tried to drag the war inside the country, but that project failed.”

Naini was speaking at a meeting to organize commemorations for December 30, a state-marked anniversary tied to mass rallies that followed the disputed 2009 presidential election and the suppression of the Green Movement protests – one of the largest episodes of unrest in Iran’s recent history.

The Green Movement is often cited alongside the 2019 Bloody November protests and the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom demonstrations as the most significant challenges to the Islamic Republic since its founding.

Naini said Iran’s adversaries had assumed that air strikes would be followed by protests, riots or internal collapse, repeating what he described as a long-standing “illusion of chaos” rooted in past episodes of unrest.

“They sat in their war rooms with a wrong calculation, waiting for disorder, riots and the breakdown of the country from within,” he said.

Instead, Naini said the attacks were followed by large public reactions that included anti-Israel rallies and funerals for those killed, which he portrayed as demonstrations of national unity.

  • Israel warns US Iran missile drills may be cover for surprise attack - Axios

    Israel warns US Iran missile drills may be cover for surprise attack - Axios

  • Israel weighs regime change in Iran, former Israeli diplomat says

    Israel weighs regime change in Iran, former Israeli diplomat says

  • Mideast upheaval leaves Iran hard-pressed to regain old footholds

    Mideast upheaval leaves Iran hard-pressed to regain old footholds

He said Israel underestimated what he described as a “fortress-like” popular cohesion and that attempts at what Iranian officials often call soft war or cognitive war aimed at weakening society from within were completely unsuccessful.

“The enemy shifted from military war to cognitive war, using pessimism, division and exaggerating social dissatisfaction to weaken the unity that was formed,” Naini said.

The remarks come as regional tensions remain high and as Israel weighs next steps.

NBC News reported over the weekend that Israeli officials are preparing to brief US President Donald Trump on options for possible new military strikes on Iran, citing concerns that Tehran is rebuilding facilities linked to ballistic missile production and repairing air defenses damaged in earlier attacks.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to raise the issue during an upcoming meeting with Trump, including options for US support or participation in any future action, according to the report.

Trump has repeatedly said US strikes in June destroyed Iran’s nuclear capabilities and has warned Tehran against trying to rebuild them. Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says its military and nuclear programs are defensive.

Naini said Iran continues to monitor what he described as hostile plans closely, adding that the lesson Iranian officials draw from both past unrest and the recent war is that internal cohesion remains decisive in confronting external threats.

One gram of gold now equals a month’s wage for Iranian workers

Dec 21, 2025, 10:14 GMT+0

An Iranian labor representative said soaring prices have eroded wages to the point where one gram of gold now equals a full month’s minimum pay for a worker.

“Today, one gram of gold is equal to a full month’s minimum wage for a worker,” said Habib Sadeghzadeh Tabrizi, an inspector with the country’s High Council of Islamic Labor Councils.

He added the collapse in real wages has reached a point where the traditional phrase “shrinking dinner table” no longer applies, adding that many workers effectively have no table left.

With gold trading at around 135.5 million rials per gram – roughly $104 at current exchange rates, and the dollar near 1.3 million rials, he said the gap between official wages and real living costs has become untenable.

He said runaway inflation has stripped Article 41 of Iran’s labor law – meant to link wages to inflation and living costs – of any practical meaning, adding that salaries now lose value even before they are paid.

Sadeghzadeh said wages for the current year were set when the dollar stood near 850,000 rials, but have since been overtaken by a sharp currency slide, leaving workers unable to plan even basic daily expenses.

“If this trend continues, it will not only destroy workers’ livelihoods but also undermine production and the wider economy,” he said, adding that fair tax exemptions and wage adjustments in line with real inflation are now a national necessity, not a sectoral demand.

'Let 100 flowers bloom': what Mao, Khrushchev can tell us about Iran today

Dec 20, 2025, 22:00 GMT+0
•
Khosro Isfahani

Tehran’s recent gestures of apparent flexibility—from looser enforcement of the hijab to an embrace of nationalist symbolism—recall moments in Communist history when a brief opening exposed risks the system ultimately moved to contain.

In 1956, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev stunned the communist world by denouncing Joseph Stalin’s crimes in a closed-door speech at the Communist Party Congress.

The address, later leaked, raised expectations that the Soviet system might be capable of reform from within. Instead, it exposed pressures the leadership struggled to contain, contributing to unrest at home and rebellion abroad—notably in Hungary—and ultimately reinforcing the limits of permissible change.

That pattern—tactical relaxation under pressure, followed by retrenchment—offers a useful lens for understanding Iran’s current moment.

Since June’s 12-day war with Israel and the United States, the Islamic Republic has been navigating what officials privately describe as a convergence of external threat and internal fragility.

Internationally, Tehran faces deepening isolation and a US administration that has shown a willingness to use force. Domestically, the aftershocks of the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom uprising continue to shape public behavior and elite anxiety.

Lifeline: patriotism

Against that backdrop, the state has adopted a dual strategy.

On one track, it has sought to soften flashpoints—particularly hijab enforcement—that could reignite street unrest. Police patrols have become less visible, enforcement more uneven, and officials have emphasized “cultural” rather than coercive methods.

On another track, the leadership has leaned into a form of state-sponsored nationalism that draws selectively on Iran’s pre-Islamic past.

Last month, authorities unveiled a statue in Tehran depicting the Roman Emperor Valerian kneeling before the Sassanid king Shapur I, commemorating a third-century Persian victory over Rome. The accompanying slogan—“You will kneel before Iran again”—was echoed in imagery portraying Israel’s prime minister in a similar posture.

Such symbolism would have been unthinkable for much of the theocracy’s history, when pre-Islamic iconography was treated with suspicion or outright hostility.

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei reinforced this shift in July when, in his first public appearance after the war, he asked a religious eulogist to perform “Ey Iran,” a nationalist song associated with the pre-revolutionary era.

The gesture was widely read, both inside Iran and abroad, as an attempt to blur the line between religious authority and national identity—and by some, as a signal of potential recalibration.

‘Let a hundred flowers bloom’

History suggests caution. Authoritarian systems have often reached for controlled liberalization or symbolic inclusion during moments of acute stress, only to reverse course once the immediate danger recedes.

Mao Zedong’s 1957 “Hundred Flowers” campaign—launched in part to manage the fallout from Khrushchev’s de-Stalinization—famously invited criticism before giving way to a sweeping crackdown when dissent exceeded official expectations.

Iran’s trajectory over recent months has followed a similar arc.

Even as officials spoke of unity and restraint, legislation advanced to tighten restrictions on speech, expand capital punishment for acts of dissent, and broaden the security services’ remit online.

Arrests and executions have continued at a steady pace, and pressure on journalists, activists and minority communities has intensified.

Earlier this month, Khamenei dismissed criticism of hijab laws as part of a Western ideological campaign, warning domestic media against amplifying such views. The judiciary chief swiftly followed suit, announcing a more coordinated effort involving police and prosecutors—a signal less of retreat than of reorganization.

The episode underscores a recurring dynamic in the Islamic Republic’s history: moments of apparent opening that generate speculation about reform, followed by moves that reassert control once the boundaries of dissent become clearer.

As with Khrushchev’s speech nearly seven decades ago, the significance may lie less in the promise of change than in what the response reveals about the system’s underlying anxieties—and the limits it is ultimately prepared to enforce.

Iranians turn to credit to afford winter celebration treats

Dec 19, 2025, 10:01 GMT+0

Soaring costs have pushed many Iranian families to buy nuts and sweets on credit ahead of Yalda Night, the traditional winter celebration marking the longest night of the year, as sharp price increases squeeze household budgets in the final days of December.

Iranian media reported that prices for various types of nuts and dried fruit have risen between 40 percent and, in some cases such as pistachios and cashews, up to 100 percent compared with last year.

Yalda is an ancient Iranian celebration marking the longest night of the year, observed on the winter solstice, usually on December 20 or 21. Families and friends gather after sunset to stay awake through the night, symbolizing the triumph of light over darkness and the gradual return of longer days.

Dideban Iran, citing official data, said the surge reflects higher production costs, currency volatility and rising packaging expenses, according to traders active in the sector.

Vendors told the outlet that demand has dropped markedly compared with last year, despite Yalda being one of Iran’s most important traditional celebrations, when families typically gather around tables filled with fruit, nuts and sweets.

The evening centres on shared food, especially pomegranates and watermelon, which are associated with health, renewal, and the memory of summer. A common ritual is fal-e Hafez, the practice of opening the poetry book of Hafez and reading verses believed to offer insight or guidance. Rooted in pre-Islamic traditions and linked to Zoroastrian ideas of light and renewal, Yalda remains a widely observed cultural event in Iran, bringing together generations around storytelling, poetry, and collective resilience against the cold and dark of winter.

Instalment sales

The prices for Yalda nuts were up 40 to 45 percent year on year, Mehdi Bakhtiari-Zadeh, acting head of Tehran’s municipal fruit and vegetable markets organization, said on Wednesday. The retail price of a kilogram of sweet nut mix this year, he said, stands at about 6,660,000 rials (around $5), compared with roughly 4,000,000 to 4,500,000 rials ($3 to 3.5) last year.

Average monthly income for workers in Iran in 2025 is generally less than $150.

With household purchasing power eroded, Dideban Iran reported that some shops have resorted to alternative sales methods, including instalment plans and even accepting checks, to attract customers unwilling or unable to pay upfront.

100%

Sweets shrink as costs climb

Rising costs have also hit the confectionery sector. The ILNA news agency quoted Ali Bahremand, head of Tehran’s confectioners and pastry sellers union, as saying there is no shortage of raw materials, but high prices have pushed consumers toward buying smaller quantities, often half-kilogram boxes instead of larger ones.

According to Bahremand’s remarks, the prices of key inputs such as cooking oil and eggs have increased by about 167 percent and 200 percent respectively compared with the same period last year, contributing to a sharp fall in overall sweet purchases.

The price hikes come amid broader increases in basic goods approved by the government in recent months. Citizens have told Iran International that dairy prices, another key ingredient for Yalda treats, have risen sharply, with some families saying such products have already been removed from their diets, underscoring how traditional celebrations are increasingly shaped by economic strain.