• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo
INSIGHT

Sharp policy swerve needed to avoid ruin, Tehran moderates warn

Behrouz Turani
Behrouz Turani

Iran International

Sep 12, 2025, 11:53 GMT+1Updated: 00:59 GMT+0
An Iranian flag flies next to a mosque in Qom during a lunar eclipse, September 7, 2025
An Iranian flag flies next to a mosque in Qom during a lunar eclipse, September 7, 2025

Voices are growing in Tehran that warn the ruling system has only a narrow window left to launch reforms essential for its survival.

In recent interviews with the centrist Entekhab website, media expert Hadi Khaniki, historian Hashem Aghajari, and former minister Abbas Akhoundi all cautioned that time for meaningful change is rapidly running out.

“The war reset societal connections, reducing individualism,” said Hadi Khaniki, an academic and former adviser to President Mohammad Khatami. “This is a moment for reorganization, but the opportunity for change is limited.”

Khaniki pointed to the temporary surge of unity during the June–July war with Israel, urging authorities to build on that momentum by fostering public satisfaction rather than relying solely on control.

“Before the war,” he noted, “issues like gasoline shortages, water scarcity, sanctions, and inequality had eroded social capital and trust in institutions. The war, however, triggered a ‘people’s war’ dynamic, fostering temporary solidarity and patriotism.”

To avoid a return to pre-war discontent, he warned, the government must reduce threats, revise failed policies, and prioritize public well-being.

Iranian Reformation

Historian Hashem Aghajari echoed similar concerns.

Best known for his 2002 blasphemy trial, he called for a “Protestant-like” overhaul of Iranian Shiism to meet contemporary needs.

“Islam in Iran needs its own Reformation, not to abandon faith, but to liberate it from clerical monopolies. Just as Luther challenged Rome, we must question the absolutism of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurisconsult),” he said.

Turning to the economic despair gripping the country, Aghajari added: “Sanctions and mismanagement have turned hope into hunger. The youth see no future unless we democratize the economy and end the kleptocracy.”

He warned the window for transformation is rapidly closing: “This opportunity is fleeting, measured in months, not years. Seize it with inclusive policies, or watch the society splinter into irreconcilable tribes.”

‘Weak mandates’

Although Aghajari’s interview was later redacted, presumably under official pressure, its transcript remains accessible through a related Entekhab interview with former minister Abbas Akhoundi.

In his September 6 interview, Akhoundi argued that Iran’s leaders operate with weak mandates and short-term horizons.

“A president elected by roughly 30% of eligible voters, and lawmakers who won less than 5%, can only pursue short-term goals,” he said.

This mode of governance, he added, had failed for nearly five decades and is unlikely to bear fruit now.

“Tehran faces three options to break the deadlock: pursue a comprehensive agreement with the West, escalate tensions to force a resolution, or continue the current inertia, ‘a suspension within a suspension,’ which would further damage livelihoods and financial stability.”

Most Viewed

Iran diplomacy wobbles as factions compete to avoid looking soft on US
1
INSIGHT

Iran diplomacy wobbles as factions compete to avoid looking soft on US

2
ANALYSIS

The politics of pink: how Iran uses cuteness to rebrand violence

3

Scam messages seek crypto for ships’ safe passage through Hormuz, firm warns

4
EXCLUSIVE

Family told missing teen was alive, then received his body 60 days later

5
INSIGHT

Is Iran entering its Gorbachev moment?

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Diplomacy tolls at Hormuz as conflict returns to its doorstep
    OPINION

    Diplomacy tolls at Hormuz as conflict returns to its doorstep

  • Opposition to US talks grows in Tehran as ceasefire deadline nears
    INSIGHT

    Opposition to US talks grows in Tehran as ceasefire deadline nears

  • Tehran moderates see ‘no deal–no war’ limbo as worst outcome
    INSIGHT

    Tehran moderates see ‘no deal–no war’ limbo as worst outcome

  • The future has been switched off here
    TEHRAN INSIDER

    The future has been switched off here

  • Lights out, then gunfire: Witnesses recount Mashhad protest crackdown
    VOICES FROM IRAN

    Lights out, then gunfire: Witnesses recount Mashhad protest crackdown

  • Is Iran entering its Gorbachev moment?
    INSIGHT

    Is Iran entering its Gorbachev moment?

•
•
•

More Stories

'Disaster' born of weakness: Iran hardliners blast IAEA deal

Sep 12, 2025, 05:43 GMT+1
•
Maryam Sinaiee

Ultra-hardliners in Tehran blasted a new nuclear deal struck in Cairo with the UN atomic watchdog, accusing negotiators of bypassing parliament and putting national security at risk.

Hardline lawmakers and media outlets say chief negotiator Abbas Araghchi and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Grossi have given contradictory accounts of the scope of inspector access to Iranian facilities.

Araghchi insisted the agreement limits inspector access for now to the Bushehr power plant, while calling it a “step in the right direction.” Grossi, by contrast, said it establishes “practical modalities” for inspections covering “all facilities and installations” in Iran.

The ultra-hardline daily Kayhan, funded by the office of Iran’s Supreme Leader, accused negotiators of bypassing parliament’s authority.

“The bitter experience of the JCPOA and the deceitful games of ‘fact sheets’ is being repeated once again—this time with a counterpart that has a record of espionage, servitude to Israel,” a Thursday editorial read.

The paper also claimed the E3 of France, Germany and the United Kingdom delayed activating the snapback mechanism and extended the deadline for reinstating UN sanctions only to prolong psychological pressure on Iran.

No trust for the IAEA

Hamid Rasaei, an ultra-hardline lawmaker, complained that he has not even been able to see the contents of the Cairo agreement.

“What Araghchi says about inspections would only be meaningful if either the text of the agreement was published or the IAEA had formally confirmed it,” he posted on X.

Rasaei also accused Grossi of passing information to Tehran’s foes and warned against granting the Agency access to bombed sites.

“What value does a commitment from an organization that has never condemned US and Israeli military strikes really have?” he asked.

Rasaei and other hardline MPs who recently tabled a “triple-urgency” bill to pull Iran out of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) now argue the Cairo agreement tramples on a June bill requiring suspension of cooperation with the IAEA.

Who benefits?

Amirhossein Sabeti, another ultra-hardline lawmaker and adviser to former nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, described the Cairo deal bluntly as a “disaster.”

“Araghchi’s deal with Grossi undermines national interests, paves the way for renewed attacks on Iran, and violates Parliament’s legislation,” he wrote on his Telegram channel.

“The return of IAEA spies and inspections of Iran’s nuclear sites serves the Agency’s interests but provides no benefit whatsoever to Iran,” he added, calling the agreement “passive and born of weakness.”

EU, US watching

Meanwhile, European governments have welcomed the Cairo accord but remain cautious.

“It is not enough for Iran to make promises for tomorrow, we need to see evidence from Iran today,” the E3—which triggered the snapback mechanism last month—said in an open letter, noting that key sites remain closed and the timeline for full access is unclear.

The United States on Wednesday urged Iran to take “immediate and concrete action” to meet its nuclear safeguards obligations, warning the IAEA board may need to act if Tehran fails to cooperate.

Will Iran engage? Tricky diplomacy looms after IAEA deal

Sep 11, 2025, 14:58 GMT+1
•
Behrouz Turani

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Wednesday cast doubt on a potential opening in the nuclear standoff, appearing to undermine the deal he had signed just a day earlier with IAEA Chief Rafael Grossi in Cairo.

Grossi had announced Tuesday that Tehran would grant inspectors access to nuclear sites. But Araghchi quickly walked it back, saying it was only “a one-time access to the Bushehr Power Plant that had been granted earlier.”

He added that any future agreement depended on halting “hostile actions against Iran, including activation of the trigger mechanism.”

The mixed signals captured Iran’s familiar pattern: apparent concessions abroad, followed by dismissive clarifications at home.

Araghchi himself has a record of burnishing his toughness after negotiations.

In 2014, he claimed he had shouted at US negotiators and thrown his pen at Wendy Sherman; the tale was later debunked, with witnesses recalling a calm exchange and even small talk about grandchildren.

Reasons for optimism

Despite Araghchi’s backtracking, many in Tehran saw Grossi’s visit as a sign Iran may be edging toward engagement.

With the snapback of international sanctions due in less than ten days, moderates urged the government to seize the moment.

Khabar Online called the Cairo deal “a first step to stop the snapback and pave the way for constructive negotiations with the United States.”

Reformist Rouydad24 and conservative Farhikhtegan alike said “Iran appears to be taking a new approach.”

That chorus grew louder on Sunday.

Prominent reformist Behzad Nabavi told Etemad that “a change in paradigms” is needed, insisting “wisdom calls for negotiations with the United States.” Former lawmaker Ali Motahari went further, urging President Masoud Pezeshkian to meet Donald Trump at the UN General Assembly in New York.

Missed Openings

The precedent is shaky.

In 2000, President Mohammad Khatami was moments from a handshake with Bill Clinton before hardliners stopped him; he reportedly ducked into a bathroom to avoid the encounter.

In 2013, Hassan Rouhani’s brief phone call with Barack Obama drew a public rebuke from Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Both moments revealed how even modest steps toward dialogue can be reversed in Tehran.

Araghchi’s Cairo reversal echoed past retreats and left many questioning whether Tehran can commit to real engagement. Skeptics argue that optimism will always be checked by the system’s instinct for resistance.

News of the Grossi agreement briefly pushed the dollar below one million rials on Tuesday, only for it to rebound above one million and ten thousand by Wednesday. Traders complained of volatility, while regional insecurity after Israel’s strike in Doha added to the pressure.

Even the markets seem unsure which way Iran is heading.

Tehran seizes on Israel’s Doha strike to bolster regional narrative

Sep 10, 2025, 22:05 GMT+1
•
Maryam Sinaiee

Israel’s strike in Doha targeting senior Hamas leaders has given Tehran a chance to present itself as the true defender of Arab sovereignty and Palestinian resistance.

The rare attack on Qatari soil—a US ally and mediator in the Israel-Hamas conflict—took place Tuesday during a Hamas leadership meeting to consider a US-backed ceasefire proposal. Qatar’s Prime Minister denounced the assault as “state terrorism,” saying it sabotaged peace efforts.

Iranian officials moved quickly to condemn the strike. President Masoud Pezeshkian phoned Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani within hours, calling the attack an “illegal, inhumane and anti-peace action.”

Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei described it as a violation of international law and Qatar’s national sovereignty, warning: “Global inaction in the face of Zionist regime’s crimes in Palestine and West Asia threatens all.”

National security chief Ali Larijani echoed the sentiment in Arabic.

“The message of the Zionist entity’s recent crime in Qatar: O countries of the region! Prepare yourselves for my upcoming dominance!” he posted on X.

Qatar-Iran relationship

Tehran’s framing draws on recent memory. Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’s political bureau chief, was assassinated in Tehran in July 2024 while attending Pezeshkian’s inauguration—a killing Iran cast as part of a broader campaign to decapitate the Hamas leadership.

Iran has also sought to distinguish its conduct from Israel’s.

When it struck the US Al Udeid air base in June, Tehran notified Qatar in advance and emphasized that Doha was not the target. Qatar condemned the strike but acknowledged Iran’s outreach and later expressed hope for continued good ties.

On September 4, Pezeshkian sent a message through top diplomat Abbas Araghchi requesting Sheikh Tamim’s help in facilitating dialogue with the US and the E3 to resume nuclear negotiations.

‘Lesson for US allies’

Many in Tehran framed Israel’s strike as a gift to the Islamic Republic’s regional narrative.

Mohammad Mokhber, a former vice president and close advisor to Khamenei, said the incident shows the futility of relying on the Abraham Accords.

Hardline activist Hatef Salehi called it a “lesson” for US allies in the region.

“It demonstrated, in the clearest way, that no matter how much Arab states serve US interests … Washington’s absolute priority is always the protection of the Israeli regime,” he posted on X.

Even moderate voices highlighted potential benefits for Tehran.

Journalist Reza Ghobeishavi argued the incident may push Gulf states closer to Iran.

“Previously, there was an idea that Israel would defend the Gulf countries against Iran, but that notion has now been weakened,” he wrote on X. “Israel’s attack on Qatar benefits Iran’s camp and Israel’s opponents, while harming the camp that supports normalizing relations with Israel.”

Iranian MP says Tehran should stop worrying and build a bomb

Sep 10, 2025, 18:53 GMT+1

An Iranian lawmaker said on Wednesday the country should pursue building a nuclear weapon since it already paid a heavy price for its nuclear activities in a 12-day conflict with Israel and the United States in June.

“I’ve always believed we should have built it long ago. I’ve always supported building a nuclear bomb because we’ve already paid the costs for it,” national security committee member Ahmad Bakhshayesh told state media on Tuesday.

Bakhshayesh argued that nuclear-armed China is a member of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and that Iran should have taken the same path long ago.

“We should have built it without leaving the NPT,” he added. “We’ve been entangled in this nuclear issue in our country for 25 years now.”

Beijing acceded to the NPT in 1992 but conducted its first nuclear weapons test in 1964. China is one of the five recognized nuclear-weapon states under the agreement, alongside the US, Russia, the UK, and France.

NPT debate in Tehran

Iran maintains that its nuclear program is peaceful.

France, Germany, and the United Kingdom last month triggered the so-called "snapback" mechanism within a 2015 international nuclear deal to which they are party along with Iran, giving Tehran 30 days to comply with the agreement or face restored international sanctions.

Calls have grown inside Iran to withdraw from the NPT in response.

A bill to exit the agreement is under review in the Iranian parliament. Some lawmakers argue the legislature can pass the measure on its own, while former nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi said the ultimate decision rests with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

'No inspection yet'

UN nuclear chief Raphael Grossi on Wednesday inked a deal to pave a way forward on resuming cooperation with Iran alongside its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi at a ceremony in Cairo.

Araghchi later told state TV that the Cairo agreement “recognizes Iran’s legitimate security concerns" and does not by itself reopen facilities to inspectors.

The three European powers said on Wednesday they were alarmed by the lack of clarity on Iran's stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium and that Tehran must show not claim if it wanted to avoid more sanctions.

Iran debates women’s motorcycle licenses amid legal ambiguity and hijab concerns

Sep 10, 2025, 11:36 GMT+1

A former senior Iranian traffic police official said there is no legal ban on issuing motorcycle licenses to women, but a regulatory gap has left them unable to ride legally, pointing to debate in parliament where some lawmakers have raised concerns over hijab compliance.

Colonel Einollah Jahani, the former deputy head of Iran’s traffic police, told ISNA news agency on Wednesday that Article 20 of the country’s traffic law currently tasks the police with issuing motorcycle licenses for men but is silent on women.

“From a legal perspective, this article only clarifies the police’s duty toward men and does not prohibit issuing licenses to women,” he said. “The silence of the law has created a gap that must be resolved by parliament.”

Iranian women, Bahareh, Saqar and Farah ride motorcycles without a license, while female motorcycling is still not officially legal, in Tehran, Iran, September 7, 2025.
100%
Iranian women, Bahareh, Saqar and Farah ride motorcycles without a license, while female motorcycling is still not officially legal, in Tehran, Iran, September 7, 2025.

The government has submitted a bill to parliament to address the issue, state media has reported, but Jahani said that some lawmakers remain uneasy over how women would observe Islamic dress codes while riding.

He argued the concern was misplaced: “Both men and women must wear helmets, and helmets provide the necessary coverage to meet hijab requirements. This is a safety obligation that also addresses religious concerns.”

  • Women’s motorcycle licenses need legal change, Iran police say

    Women’s motorcycle licenses need legal change, Iran police say

  • Tehran cafe shut down over women bikers’ event

    Tehran cafe shut down over women bikers’ event

Iran’s traffic police chief, Brigadier General Teymour Hosseini, said earlier this week that any licensing of women would require formal changes to bylaws and law, and that the force was “awaiting an official notification on women’s motorcycling so we can proceed.”

Women have been legally allowed to own and register motorcycles in their name, but licensing has been withheld, leaving many to ride without permits in a legal gray zone.

Jahani said this inconsistency should be corrected: “There is no prohibition for women to own motorcycles under the constitution. They can hold official registration papers in their own name, so logically they should also be able to obtain licenses.”

He added that women have increasingly demanded the right to ride motorcycles, citing economic pressures, traffic congestion and the need for affordable transportation.

Iranian woman, Bahareh, sits on her motorcycle, while female motorcycling is still not officially legal, in Tehran, Iran, September 7, 2025.
100%

“In the past there was no demand, but today motorcycling has become a social demand,” he said, noting that research shows women generally drive more cautiously than men.

The debate comes against the backdrop of wider calls for women’s rights in Iran since the 2022 death of Mahsa Amini in morality police custody, which ignited nationwide protests.

Conservative clerics have resisted moves to permit public motorcycling by women, arguing it could breach social norms, but reformist officials say formal training courses can provide a workable compromise.