Buying property in Tehran could take 80 years of saving, official says

Iran’s political establishment views negotiations with the United States as the only way to avoid further escalation and existential peril, the report said citing its sources.

Iran’s leadership has now leaned towards talks as "they’ve seen the cost of military confrontation,” the report quoted one Iranian political insider as saying.

The report comes two months after Israel launched land and air strikes targeting senior Iranian military leaders, nuclear scientists, and politicians, while damaging or destroying Iranian air defenses and nuclear facilities.

The Israeli strikes began on June 13, on the eve of the sixth round of negotiations with the United States.

On the ninth day of fighting, the United States bombed three Iranian nuclear sites which US President Donald Trump has consistently said "obliterated" the country's nuclear program.

Trump has warned that he would not hesitate to strike Iran again if the country resumes uranium enrichment.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio along with foreign ministers of France, Germany and Britain set an informal end-August deadline for a new nuclear deal, warning that failure would prompt the E3 to reinstate UN sanctions on Iran using the so-called "snapback" mechanism.

European officials have warned Tehran that unless it fully cooperates with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the mechanism could be activated, restoring UN sanctions this fall.

In a meeting assessing the situation after the 12-day war between Israel and the Islamic Republic, Iran's former president Hassan Rouhani told advisers that easing tensions with global powers, including the US, is necessary for the country.

“If we can reduce tensions with Europe, our neighbors, the East and West, and even the United States in favor of national interests, not only is there nothing wrong with it, but it is necessary and obligatory,” Rouhani said.

Tehran moderates are increasingly openly signaling readiness for a return to nuclear talks, hinting at accepting some restrictions on its activities.

The convergence — from reformist academics to former officials close to the Supreme Leader — points to an unusual degree of agreement that the status quo, especially after the June war with Israel, is unsustainable.

“There is no way to save the country except for all of us to become servants of the people — to recognize that sovereignty belongs to the people,” moderate outlet Entekhab quoted Rouhani as saying on Thursday. “The Iranian nation owns Iran.”

Rouhani also urged an overhaul of media regulations to allow private broadcasters alongside the state’s. “We should have 10, 20, 30 channels that are private, owned by the people,” he said. “If we want the people to be with us, this is the way.”

‘Obligation to negotiate’

Rouhani’s remarks come amid a season of acute pressures — a setback in the June conflict with Israel, an economy battered by sanctions and mismanagement, and rolling water and electricity outages in a sweltering summer that have pushed many Iranians to the edge.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has in recent weeks all but raised his hands in defeat, implying that real power lies elsewhere when it comes to key policies such as relations with the United States.

Rouhani picked up where Pezeshkian left off.

“If we can improve relations with Europe, our neighbors, and both East and West—even reduce tensions with the United States—and it serves our interests, then why not?” he said.

“Not only is there nothing wrong with it, it is our duty and obligation.”

‘Iran in ruins’

Prominent sociologist Taqi Azad Armaki went further, calling for an ideological shift toward a normal state.

“The government has only two options: change its outdated approaches or face a deadlock,” he said on Wednesday. “Iran must embrace global norms to overcome its political, economic, and cultural challenges and improve its international image.”

But the most scathing take came from former MP Parvaneh Salahshoouri, who appeared to address Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei directly.

“With its ‘Islamic Ummah’ doctrine, the Islamic Republic built neither an ummah nor preserved the Iranian nation,” she posted on X, citing the Arabic word for religious community—central to the thinking and behavior of Iran’s theocratic rule.

“What remains is a ruined Iran, and from the Islamic Ummah, only curses and hatred toward it,” she added, leaving little doubt as to whom she blamed with direct references to Khamenei’s catchphrases.

“(The Islamic Republic) squandered ‘dignity and wisdom’ with the ‘no war, no negotiations’ stance — and yet there was both war and negotiations — and now it is even struggling to preserve Iran itself.”

“Israel’s strikes on Evin prison on June 23 killed and injured scores of civilians without any evident military target in violation of the laws of war and is an apparent war crime,” said Michael Page, the rights group's deputy Middle East director said.

“The Israeli attack placed at grave risk the already precarious lives of Evin’s prisoners, many of them wrongfully detained dissidents and activists.”

More than 1,500 people were believed to be held in Evin at the time, including political activists imprisoned in violation of their rights by the Iranian government, the group added.

The attack which took place during visiting hours caused extensive damage to the visitation hall, the central kitchen, the medical clinic, and sections where prisoners — including political detainees — were held.

Citing official Iranian figures, Human Rights Watch said at least 80 people were killed, including prisoners, their family members, and prison staff. Iran’s judiciary announced that at least 71 people were killed, also citing the victims to be a mix of prison personnel, prisoners, visiting relatives, and nearby civilians.

Former Iranian political prisoner and student activist Motahareh Gounei said in July that the government wanted the inmates, many of whom are political prisoners, "to be buried under the rubble of war” .

At the time of the attacks, the office of the Israeli defense minister, Israel Katz, released a statement announcing the strikes.

"The IDF is now attacking with unprecedented force regime targets and government repression bodies in the heart of Tehran, including the Basij headquarters, Evin prison for political prisoners and opponents of the regime, the 'Israel Destruction' clock in Palestine Square, the internal security headquarters of the Revolutionary Guards, the ideology headquarters, and other regime targets," the statement said on June 23.

Under international humanitarian law, prisons are considered civilian infrastructure.

Human Rights Watch said the laws of war prohibit “attacks that target civilians and civilian objects, that do not discriminate between civilians and combatants, or that are expected to cause harm to civilians or civilian objects disproportionate to any anticipated military advantage.”

On the day of the strike, amid massive criticism from rights groups, Israel's military spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said the attack was carried out “in a pinpoint manner, to avoid harm to those uninvolved.”

Among the critics was Nobel Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi, a former inmate and dissident, who said at the time: "Attacking a prison when the inmates are standing behind closed doors and they are unable to do the slightest thing to save themselves, can never be a legitimate target.”

More than 600 political prisoners were transferred back to Tehran’s Evin Prison earlier in August with some political prisoners saying Iran used brute violence during the process.

A senior figure from Iranian Kurdish parties in Sulaymaniyah told Iran International that “one of the topics discussed between Iran and Iraq during Ali Larijani’s trip to Baghdad was the increase of pressure and further restrictions on Kurdish parties.”

Separately, an opposition figure based in Erbil said that “after Larijani’s visit to Iraq, sources in the Kurdistan Regional Government warned all parties that if Israel attacks the Islamic Republic again, the likelihood of threats from Iran against the Kurdistan Region and these parties is serious.”

Both sources confirmed to Iran International that “in the event of a possible next Israeli attack on Iran, the Islamic Republic will react against the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.”

On Wednesday night, Iraq’s National Security Advisory issued a statement saying that the document signed between Baghdad and Tehran during Larijani’s trip was a “security memorandum of understanding for cooperation on border affairs and confronting Iranian Kurdish opposition.”

The statement noted that Iraq already had a security protocol with Iran, signed in March 2023, known as the Joint Security Agreement. That agreement covered “border security and measures to neutralize the activities of Iranian Kurdish opposition forces present in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.”

According to the advisory, the memorandum signed this week was the result of earlier coordination to convert the existing protocol into a formal memorandum of understanding with the same content, including “matters concerning the five Iranian Kurdish opposition parties.”

The statement added that the document was prepared before recent hostilities between Israel and Iran, had been approved by Iraq’s Council of Ministers, and was signed during Larijani’s visit in the presence of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani.

The advisory stressed that “there is no security agreement between the two countries; rather, it is a security memorandum of understanding.”

According to information obtained by Iran International, another goal of Larijani’s trip was to encourage Shi’ite factions to push for parliamentary approval of a Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) bill.

The PMF, or Hashd al-Shaabi, is an umbrella organization of Shi’ite militias formed under the direct supervision of Qasem Soleimani, the late commander of the IRGC Quds Force.

In March 2025, the Iraqi parliament introduced draft legislation seeking to reform the PMF by placing it more firmly under the authority of the prime minister as commander-in-chief, explicitly aiming to limit external influence, including from Iran.

The reported flight diversion comes amid strained ties between Tehran and Damascus following the ouster of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad late last year. His successor, Ahmed al-Shara, has criticized Iran’s military role in Syria as destabilizing.

Iran International could not independently verify the Israeli media report on the flight route.

Larijani, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, arrived in Beirut on Wednesday for meetings with senior Lebanese officials, including President Joseph Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem.

Aoun told Larijani that no group in Lebanon should bear arms or seek foreign support, warning against interference in the country’s internal affairs.

Larijani responded that Iran respects decisions taken by the Lebanese government and does not interfere in its domestic matters.

During his visit, Larijani reaffirmed Tehran’s backing for Lebanon and its “resistance” against Israel – a term he used to refer to Tehran-backed groups such as the Shi’ite group Hezbollah, and offered assistance in reconstruction efforts.

The visit came days after Lebanon’s cabinet instructed the army to present a plan to disarm Hezbollah by the end of August, a move Tehran has publicly opposed.

Lebanon’s foreign ministry last week condemned remarks by a senior Iranian official rejecting the disarmament plan as “unacceptable interference.”