Iranian Nobel Laureate Sentenced To 15 More Months In Prison

Nobel laureate Narges Mohammadi has been sentenced to a further 15 months behind bars, her fifth conviction since 2021 and third from inside prison.

Nobel laureate Narges Mohammadi has been sentenced to a further 15 months behind bars, her fifth conviction since 2021 and third from inside prison.
She was also handed a two-year exile outside Tehran and neighboring provinces, a two-year travel ban, a two-year prohibition from joining groups, and a two-year restriction from using a smartphone.
The trial of the human rights advocate, the spokesperson of the Defenders of Human Rights Centre (DHRC), took place on December 19 at the Tehran Revolutionary Court, with charges primarily related to "propaganda against the Islamic Republic system".
Mohammadi did not attend the questioning and trial sessions and the court's decision was issued in absentia.
As the regime cracks down ever harder on mass dissent, Mohammadi is one of several figures daring to defy the government being held publicly to account with severe and ongoing sentencing. Tehran insists that the activist “incites and encourages the public and individuals to create chaos and turmoil."
The 2023 Nobel Peace Prize ceremony in Oslo saw her 17-year-old twins, Ali and Kiana Rahmani, receive the prize on her behalf.
Her total five convictions amount to 12 years and 3 months of imprisonment, 154 lashes, 4 months of travel ban, 2 years of exile, and various social and political prohibitions.
She has suffered ill health behind bars and the government continues to use her as a warning to others.

Iran is grappling with a significant infrastructure deficit of $500 billion, yet the political elite is largely unaware of the problem, according to an economist in Tehran.
Economics professor, Vahid Shahri, told local media that the government’s annual budget deficit of a few billions of dollars is not the most serious issue. What is crucial is the declining energy and water resources in the country, serious imbalances in the economy, lack of money in the government pension funds and other shortages. These imbalances will add pressure to the government every year and require larger operating budgets.
“The government should consider all of these deficits in its economic analysis, and the problem lies in the fact that the government does not see these deficits, even though it will be responsible for financing every single one of them,” Shahri argued.
Iran is facing a serious economic crisis since the United States withdrew from the JCPAO nuclear accord and imposed sanctions in 2018. However, the country’s economic vows go much deeper, as the Islamic regime failed to leverage its oil export revenues to properly invest in infrastructure and development since the 1990s. It is estimated that Iran sold around $1.5 trillion of oil in the past two decades, yet it faces a bankrupt government that has a stranglehold over 80 percent of the economy.

Shahri explained that in order to prevent a catastrophic situation, the government needs to spend $100-150 billion annually in the next few years. If this investment is not made, the cumulative effect of imbalances can lead to the collapse of the system.
Restricted by US oil export sanctions, Iran sells its crude at lower prices to China and earns around $30 billion per year, with no other significant revenues in hard currencies. This does not even cover the annual budget of the government and there are no other funds for long-term investment.
Government officials have recently admitted that most of the $150-billion National Development Fund, or the sovereign wealth fund has been spent, since 2012, leaving nothing for investment. Foreign investments are also virtually non-existent due to sanctions and lack of political confidence in the Islamic Republic regime that has adversarial relations with Western countries and a government-controlled economy.
A report in Tehran media on Monday showed that there are more than 2,000 registered quasi-governmental companies that are often exempt from taxes, enjoy monopolies and avoid any accountability. These companies are run by regime insiders as their private fiefdoms, and often when they lose money, they turn to borrow from government banks, which are also run through the same political network of government loyalists.
Shahri argued that the fundamental imbalances also exacerbate Iran’s high annual inflation rate, which hovers at around 50 percent.
“If we cannot address these deficits, Iran will enter a hyperinflation path. It should be noted that hyperinflation does not mean a 40% inflation growth per year; rather, it means a 50% inflation growth every month. In this case, Iran will face unprecedented conditions. If we cannot control the imbalances, we are destined for hyperinflation in the next 5 years,” the economist emphasized.
Most commentators in Iran, along with many regime politicians, frequently attribute the current economic difficulties to President Ebrahim Raisi's weak administration. This perspective often overlooks the country's foreign policy, which is typically viewed as the domain of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. US and European sanctions and a lack of foreign investments have left Iran with sole reliance on limited oil exports.
Additionally, commentators often neglect to address the fundamental causes of economic inefficiencies, which critics argue stem from a government-controlled economy that fosters corruption and nepotism.

The Iranian government, long accused of being a primary supporter of terrorism, has issued a verdict condemning Washington for alleged assistance to the Jundallah terrorist group.
The Judiciary's announcement reveals that, following a lawsuit filed by 93 plaintiffs, including victims and survivors of the 2010 Chabahar suicide bombing, a special branch dealing with international lawsuits issued a verdict against the US government.
The incident, which took place on December 14, 2010, involved two suicide bombers targeting a Shia Muslim mourning procession in Chabahar, killing 39 people and injuring nearly 70.
Iran accuses Washington of orchestrating the attack and supporting the Jundullah group, a Sunni extremist rebel group that claimed responsibility for the bombing. US officials have not reacted to the accusation.
As part of the verdict, Iran claims “the US government has been ordered to pay a total of $290m for 58 injured ones of the terrorist incident (equivalent to $5m per claimant) and $140m for 35 family members of the victims (equivalent to $4m per claimant) as material damages.”
Additionally, Washington is sentenced to pay a total of $744 million for 93 claimants (equivalent to $8m per claimant) as “emotional damages.” The court has further condemned the US government to pay “punitive damages” equal to twice the emotional damages, totaling $1.488b, along with covering litigation costs and attorney fees.
In this case, the collective order for the defendant amounts to $2.662b.
Facing scrutiny for backing terrorist groups such as Hamas and the Yemeni Houthis, Tehran is seemingly attempting to shift blame onto the US to alleviate international pressure on itself.

The upcoming speech by Iran's Foreign Minister at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos has ignited controversy, primarily due to accusations of his support for Hamas terrorists.
Jason Brodsky, Policy Director at United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), expressed concerns regarding Hossein Amir-Abdollahian's connections with Hamas. Brodsky, in light of the WEF's theme of Rebuilding Trust, criticized the invitation, pointing to the foreign minister's defense of individuals accused of severe crimes.
“This is a man who defended Hamas terrorists as they raped women, baked babies in ovens, sliced women's breasts off, mutilated genitalia, and murdered citizens on 10/7 in Israel from many of the countries gathered in Davos,” he added.
Brodsky raised questions about whether WEF partners, including major corporations like Goldman Sachs, want their brands associated with someone tied to sponsoring terrorists engaged in atrocities. He highlighted the inconsistency of not inviting Hamas leadership while extending invitations to sponsors purportedly linked to such groups.
Calls have been made for the World Economic Forum to rescind Amir-Abdollahian's invitation due to his close ties to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Mark Wallace, CEO of United Against Nuclear Iran, and Alireza Akhondi, a Swedish parliament member of Iranian descent, conveyed their concerns in a letter to the forum and Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis.
The letter underscored Amir-Abdollahian's affiliation with the IRGC's Basij paramilitary force and the IRGC Quds Force, citing his involvement in planning meetings before the October 7 Hamas onslaught on Israel. Wallace and Akhondi urged Switzerland and the WEF to deny a visa and invitation to a major Iranian sponsor allegedly connected to Hamas.
The 54th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum is scheduled to take place from January 15 to January 19, 2024.

Iran has significantly increased the consumption of Mazut, a dirty fuel, in cement factories, despite widespread warnings and criticisms of its use in power plants.
Ali-Akbar Alvandian, the secretary of the Association of Employers of the Cement Industry in Iran, has reported a several-fold increase in Mazut consumption in cement factories.
Alvandian informed ILNA news agency on January 12 that the gas consumption of the country's cement factories has decreased to 6 million cubic meters per day in winter, while their usual daily consumption stands at 27 million cubic meters. He revealed that 70% of the country's cement production now relies on Mazut fuel.
Iran faces a significant natural gas shortage during the winter, leading to the utilization of the highly polluting Mazut as an alternative fuel. While one liter of Mazut can replace one cubic meter of gas, its pollution levels are substantially higher than those of natural gas.

According to the Environment Agency of the German government as well as US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the direct CO2 emissions of Mazut (fuel oil) are 33% higher than natural gas. Iran’s Mazut also contains 3.5% sulfur, which is approximately seven times higher than the required standards for ship fuel, making it far more pollutant than natural gas.
Alvandian continued, mentioning that factories located away from urban areas use Mazut as an alternative fuel, but factories near cities have excluded furnaces have reduced its use.
He further disclosed that, on a general scale, 70 percent of the country's cement production now relies on Mazut fuel. Given the daily gas requirement of 27 million cubic meters for cement factories across the country, the current delivery of six million cubic meters per day combined with the production of 70 percent of the country's cement using Mazut, indicates that approximately 13 million liters of Mazut are used daily in Iran's cement production.
A document from the National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC), obtained by Iran International, reveals that Iran uses Mazut in cement factories even during the warm seasons. According to this document, the average gas delivery to cement factories during the summer was around 20 million liters per day, indicating that the sector used roughly 7 million liters of Mazut daily at full capacity.
Iran is currently grappling with a gas shortage not only in the cold seasons but also in spring and summer, leading to the utilization of Mazut as a fuel source.
Another document from the Ministry of Oil illustrates that Iran consumed 19 million liters of Mazut daily in industries and power plants during the spring and summer of the previous year. Mazut consumption in these sectors surges to 45 million liters per day in winter, with daily diesel consumption increasing by 10 million liters from summer to winter, reaching 127 million liters. This increase is attributed to a higher substitution of diesel with natural gas in the power and industrial sectors.
Alvandian has noted that the cost of cement production with Mazut is higher than the cost of production with gas, posing a dilemma for cement factories in the eastern part of the country that have switched to Mazut. He mentioned, "Cement factories are forced to source their required Mazut from the Rey and Tehran oil storage facilities, and the cost of transporting Mazut from Tehran to the eastern provinces is added to the production cost of these units."
Despite the country not experiencing the same level of cold as the previous year, gas consumption for domestic households remains unchanged compared to last year, making restrictions on gas supply to industries, including cement factories, inevitable, according to officials.

Statistics from the National Iranian Gas Company reveal that on Friday, January 12, the breakdown of gas consumption was as follows: the household sector consumed 385 million cubic meters, the transportation sector consumed 27.5 million cubic meters, the public and commercial sector consumed 60.5 million cubic meters, the agricultural sector consumed 27.5 million cubic meters, and the small industries sector consumed 60.5 million cubic meters. In total, these sectors accounted for 550 million cubic meters of gas consumption, which is 3.3 times higher than summer consumption.
The substantial increase in gas consumption in these sectors has compelled the government to significantly reduce gas supply to major industries, including cement, steel, petrochemicals, and others.
A document from the National Petrochemical Company indicates that Iran's petrochemical production capacity was 91.5 million tons last year. However, due to gas shortages in the fall and winter, as well as power outages in the summer, only two-thirds of this capacity was operational, resulting in actual petrochemical production in the country totaling only 59.7 million tons.
In a related context, Mehdi Mahdavi Abhari, the Secretary-General of the Petrochemical Employers Association, announced last week that Iran lost $800 million in petrochemical exports due to gas supply shortages last year.
The document from the National Gas Company reveals that during the summer, nearly 70 million cubic meters of gas were supplied daily to petrochemical plants, 20 million cubic meters to cement factories, 36.5 million cubic meters to steel mills, and 17.7 million cubic meters to refineries. In total, during the summer, 145.5 million cubic meters of gas were delivered to the country's major industries. However, on January 12 this year, this figure decreased to 110 million cubic meters.
Although Iran's winter is still relatively mild, last year, on some days, gas consumption in the residential, commercial, and small industrial sectors in Iran had reached nearly 650 million cubic meters. This resulted in Iran facing a daily gas deficit of 250 million cubic meters last winter.

A TV host in Iran suggested on an IRGC-affiliated channel that it is perhaps time to produce nuclear weapons sparking controversy.
In the Saturday program on Ofogh Channel, the host, Hossein Hosseini, said "Is it not time for Iran to produce its first nuclear weapon, given the ongoing conflict against Gaza and repeated threats from Israel?"
The host directed the question to the head of the Atomic Energy Organization. Mohammad Eslami, in response, said that “the production of weapons of mass destruction has never been part of Iran's defensive doctrine and is not aligned with its foreign policy," in spite of the country's ongoing nuclear enrichment.
When questioned about possessing nuclear weapons for power balance, Eslami clarified, "It is not an inability; rather, it is a lack of desire. Our system's will is not inclined towards such a thing. The national security strategy is to move forward in this direction. We have reached a point where there is deterrence without violating any laws," though the international nuclear regulator has repeatedly voiced concerns about Iran exceeding levels of enrichment allowed under international law.
A former IRIB employee, Hadi Zonouzi, suggested on X that the question has been intentional. He stated, "This question was not without coordination! I have conducted numerous programs like this on radio and television, and there has never been an uncoordinated question with managers and guests at this level! Rest assured that there is news on the way!"
The development unfolds against the backdrop of the US assertion that Iran has the capacity to produce fissile material sufficient for nuclear weapons within two weeks. Iran, however, claims that its nuclear program is “solely for peaceful purposes.”






