Iranians question official inaction over opium epidemic
An Iranian man smokes opium using a traditional pipe
Once tucked away in quiet corners of rural life, opium has grown into a central fact of existence in Iran—traded openly, consumed quietly and relied upon by millions looking to salve social and economic anxiety.
In voice messages and phone calls to Iran International, Iranians from cities and provinces across the country said they believed the usually vigilant state turns a blind idea to the blight.
“The regime uses it to suppress voices,” said Hamid from Siahkal. “They instantly arrest women for not wearing the hijab. You think they can’t stop opium? Of course they can. But they don’t want to.”
Former health minister sparks outrage
The latest public reckoning began when a video of former Health Minister Dr. Reza Malekzadeh circulated widely online last month. “The highest opium consumption in Iran is in Rafsanjan in Kerman province; 27% of the people in this city use opium. Golestan ranks next with 18%,” he said.
A close-up view of raw opium being harvested from poppy pods in a field
The backlash from residents of Rafsanjan was swift, prompting Malekzadeh to release a second video. This time, he broadened the scope: “More than 45% of the world’s opium production is consumed in Iran, and about 10% of the population over the age of 40 uses opium either recreationally or due to addiction.”
According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Iran consumes approximately 450 metric tons of opium annually—about 42% of the global total.
While statistics vary, all indicators point to an addiction crisis of unprecedented scale driven by proximity to Afghan production, weak deterrent policies and systemic neglect.
From local habit to national structure
Sociologist Saeed Peyvandi said Iran’s addiction crisis deepened after the 1979 revolution, when the state embraced violent crackdowns instead of treatment.
“After the Islamic Revolution it expanded so much and we are dealing with a very vast social phenomenon,” he told Iran International. “Before the revolution it was so geographical … but after, the clerical rulers began a very tough stance to arrest and execute drug dealers … and we witnessed its expansion in contrast.”
Bundles of opium wrapped in black plastic and tape, likely seized during a drug enforcement operation in Iran.
“The policies of the Islamic Republic, excluding the human element from the process and putting stigma on addicts led them to become addicted again. The rehabilitation is done very badly and they are humiliated,” he added.
In contrast to Iran’s punitive approach, Peyvandi cited decriminalization and public health strategies in countries like Portugal, the Netherlands and Switzerland.
“The more secret such acts become, the harder it is to treat them,” he said.
‘The system does not want to solve the issue’
For many inside the country, the failure to address addiction is not just incompetence, but deliberate neglect, said Sam from the northwestern city of Anzali.
Despite claims of nationwide surveillance, Sam said drugs move freely. “You say you have (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) IRGC intelligence and the intelligence ministry who watch every single move. So why is this happening?”
“With so much economic strain and social repression, people can't tolerate the pressure anymore,” he added. “There are no pastimes or fun."
Majid from Mashhad offered a simpler explanation. “The simplest reason for vast use of opium in Iran is that there is money in it,” he said.
“Either for those addicted to it, or those who want to quit.”
'A tool of political control'
Hamid from Siahkal near the Caspian Sea likened Iran to a mental asylum. “The only medication to use is opium,” he said. “It's the good stuff, which soothes the people and makes them sit down and never think of getting back up.”
A collection of traditional opium pipes
“(Authorities) clamp down on everything like a piece of cake. Two girls come out without hijabs and they instantly arrest them. You think they can't deal with the opium problem?”
“Unfortunately, we Iranians, when in great pain, take stronger painkillers—and opium is considered a painkiller as well. My body can’t tolerate it, otherwise I would have taken some myself.”
Ehsan from Tehran drew a similar conclusion. “I believe the Islamic Republic is using opium as a preventive,” he said.
“If you go to rehab centers, you will see that it is making guys more addicted because junkies cannot shout and raise their voices against the government.”
“The Revolutionary Guard is the largest narcotics cartel itself … It's not just opium. You can easily find crack and meth inside Iran,” he added.
A society without alternatives
For Toomaj in Rasht in northwest Iran, the problem is not only addiction, but isolation. “All are profiteers—from the ones who bring Methadone to those who sell drugs,” he said. “They are trading using the life of people.”
“In other countries, people find a good feeling in nightclubs, bars. When none of them are available in Iran, people have to make themselves happy with something else.”
Iran has carried out amputation sentences on two people convicted of theft in Isfahan Central Prison, the head of the Isfahan Justice Department announced on Tuesday.
Asadollah Jaafari, who did not identify the two men, described them as "professional thieves” with multiple convictions as well as crimes such as destruction and intentional harm.
He added that the sentences were carried out "after undergoing legal procedures in the prosecutor's office, the preliminary court, and the provincial appeals court, with final confirmation of the verdict by the Supreme Court."
However, Jaafari did not provide specific details regarding the specific charges.
International human rights organizations have consistently condemned such punishments.
In April, Mai Sato, the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Iran, told Iran International in an interview that "corporal punishment, including amputation, is absolutely prohibited under international law. And if executed, will amount to torture or ill-treatment."
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Iran is a signatory, explicitly prohibits inhumane or degrading punishments. Human rights advocates argue that amputation sentences violate the fundamental principle of human dignity enshrined in international law.
At least 237 individuals in Iran were sentenced to amputation between 1 January 2000 and 24 September 2020, with at least 129 of those sentences carried out, according to Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the UN Human Rights Office.
According to Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei, Iran's judiciary chief, "If theft is proven under the conditions set by Islam, the thief's fingers must be amputated."
Lawyers of a South Korean woman allegedly raped by Iranian athletes during the 2025 Asian Athletics Championships say Seoul has full jurisdiction over the case, which may lead to life sentences under domestic sexual violence laws, rejecting any external pressure for a settlement.
In a response to Iran International, the legal team at TAERYUN Law Firm said Korean criminal law clearly applies to the case as the alleged assault occurred on South Korean soil.
“Korean criminal law applies to offenses committed within Korea, regardless of nationality or whether the crime occurred during an international competition,” the law firm said.
“No international sports event, diplomatic immunity, or any kind of honor can overshadow the pain of the victim. We will stand by the victim until the end so that she does not suffer alone.”
The suspects—two athletes and one coach from the Iranian delegation—remain in custody after being arrested at a hotel in Gumi on May 31. According to Iranian media, the athletes claimed partial consent; however, authorities rejected that defense and detained all three men.
Grave criminal case, not a diplomatic sideshow, law firm says
TAERYUN is pursuing the case under Articles 297 and 298 of South Korea’s Criminal Act (rape and forcible molestation), crimes that can carry penalties of up to life imprisonment. The firm also said that the case may qualify for aggravated charges under special provisions for sexual offenses.
“This is not a simple legal dispute but a fight to protect the victim’s life,” TAERYUN said. “We will resolutely oppose any external pressure or attempts at settlement.”
The law firm stressed that the victim is suffering from severe psychological trauma, and efforts are underway to protect her identity and mental well-being under Article 30 of the law concerning sexual crimes.
“The victim’s wishes must be fully respected and her protection must be the top priority,” TAERYUN added, warning against any attempt to repatriate the suspects.
Pressure builds in Iran
The case has generated a firestorm of controversy in Iran, where public protests and growing scrutiny of Iran’s sports leadership are prompting officials to distance themselves from the accused and call for resignations.
Earlier in the month, Ahmad Rastineh, spokesman for the Iranian parliament’s Cultural Committee, confirmed that the Minister of Sport, Ahmad Donyamali, had been summoned to explain the incident.
“It was decided that an urgent report on the incident and the violations that occurred be submitted to the Cultural Committee,” Rastineh said.
He added that preliminary investigations revealed mismanagement by team supervisors and that disciplinary action would include suspending the head of the delegation’s security, as well as the team’s head coach and supervisor, until the case is resolved.
Meanwhile, Rouhollah Lak-Aliabadi, spokesman for the Parliament’s Sports Faction, told protesters gathered outside the Iranian parliament that key officials must resign in the wake of the scandal.
“Those responsible must be held accountable. They must resign,” Lak-Aliabadi said in a widely shared video, responding to family members of Iranian athletes demanding the dismissal of senior sports officials.
He criticized public remarks downplaying the seriousness of the incident and rebuked former national football coach Mohammad Mayelikohan’s comment that “this happens in other countries too,” saying: “It may be ordinary elsewhere, but it is not normal for Iran, and we will take this very seriously.”
File photo of Ehsan Haddadi
Allegations against federation president resurface
The scandal has reignited long-standing accusations against Ehsan Haddadi, president of Iran’s Athletics Federation. Haddadi, a former Olympic medalist, has faced past allegations, including an unresolved claim of sexual assault.
Protesters outside the parliament accused Hadadi of failing to oversee athlete conduct and accused him of traveling with personal guests while delegating responsibility.
One woman at the demonstration told lawmakers:“I have a young daughter. Yet a bachelor who has an open sexual assault case, was made a federation director. On his first trip with the national team, he abandoned athletes and brought a personal guest.”
Multiple rallies have been held by members of Iran’s track and field community, with thousands signing petitions calling for Haddadi’s removal, citing both the latest incident and past misconduct allegations.
The murder of 24-year-old Elahe Hosseinnejad gripped Iran, sparking grief and anger over gender violence, legal discrimination and the state’s failure to protect women.
Hosseinnejad, a nail technician from Eslamshahr, south of Tehran, vanished on May 25 after leaving work to care for her younger brother.
Her disappearance quickly drew attention after her family raised the alarm on social media, prompting thousands to share her photo in hopes of locating her.
Instagram posts by Hosseinnejad show a determined young woman supporting her family, expressing sympathy for executed protesters and backing the Woman, Life, Freedom movement.
On June 5, police arrested a man in his early 30s in connection with her death. Authorities said he operated an unlicensed taxi and had a criminal record.
Public reaction
The response was immediate. Messages of sorrow poured in from citizens, artists, and public figures.
“One murder victim and 90 million wounded,” many posted on social media.
Zahra Behrouz-Azar, vice president for women and family affairs, wrote on Telegram that the reaction sent a clear message: preventing violence against women is a national demand.
She cited “cultural and economic crises, weaknesses in preventive infrastructure, and gaps in legal and support systems” as causes.
State and police criticized
After her disappearance, many accused the authorities of systemic failure to protect citizens—especially women.
“How is it that thousands of agents and surveillance cameras are present across cities to harass Iranian women for improper veiling, but no measures (are taken) to ensure the safety of citizens, especially women?” activist and former political prisoner Hossein Ronaghi asked on X before Hosseinnejad’s body was found.
Hours after the arrest, police released two videos of the suspect’s interrogation and confession.
In the footage, he admits to trying to steal Hosseinnejad’s phone, stabbing her when she resisted and abandoning her body near Tehran’s airport. One video shows him on the floor during interrogation, recoiling after being slapped.
“The videos of the arrest and interrogation of Elaheh Hosseinnejad’s murderer are enough on their own to make me lose all hope in the improvement of security in this country,” digital rights activist and entrepreneur Nima Namdari posted on X.
“Justice will never be established in a country where the rights of the accused and the principles of fair trial are not respected. As long as there is no justice, there will be no security,” he added.
Murder is punishable by death, but if a man kills a woman, the victim’s family must first pay half the value of full blood money (diyeh)—set annually by judicial authorities—to the killer’s family before the execution can proceed.
This does not apply when both victim and perpetrator are male, reinforcing what activists call a system that devalues women’s lives.
“Why should the victim and their family bear the cost of the inequality in the law?” user @mynamefarshad posted on X.
Supporters of Sharia-based laws say the system allows flexibility. In high-profile cases, the state can pay the blood money itself to proceed with execution under Islamic jurisprudence.
Police released Hosseinnejad’s body to her family on Friday. Citizen reports say she was buried immediately, under strict security, without a public announcement in Eslamshahr.
People in Iran are often accused of contributing to the country’s economic woes through wasteful habits—not just by officials, but by one another. But how much truth is there to these claims?
People in Iran are often accused of contributing to the country’s economic woes through wasteful habits—not just by officials, but by one another. But how much truth is there to these claims?
One common claim is that Iranians use far more electricity than other nations. But data from Iran’s Energy Ministry shows that per capita household electricity consumption is about 1,100 kilowatt-hours per year—40% lower than the EU average, and well below usage in the US, Canada, Japan, or even many neighboring countries.
It’s the same story with food.
Iran’s agriculture minister recently criticized Iranians for “excessive consumption” of sugar and cooking oil, asserting that government subsidies are being squandered.
But that assertion appears to contradict data from the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which shows that Iran’s per capita consumption of both items is below the global average and significantly lower than in nearby countries like Turkey.
Last year, Iranians consumed 2.3 million tons of cooking oil, compared to 3.5 million tons in Turkey, which has a similar population. On a per capita basis, Iranian consumption is 30% lower than the global average.
The minister also claimed that 90% of Iran’s cooking oil is imported at subsidized rates, yet FAO data puts the figure closer to 56%, with imports steadily declining over the past three years.
Sugar tells a similar story. Iranians consume about 10% less than the global average, and nearly half as much as Turks. Far from being excessive, these levels reflect increasing constraints on household consumption.
Chasing the basics
These accusations also overlook a crucial fact: food inflation in Iran is out of control. The price of cooking oil surged 20% in just three months, according to a report by economic outlet Tejarat News on Monday.
Iran’s Statistical Center reports annual inflation of 31% for cooking oil and 41% for sugar.
Such price spikes make basic goods increasingly unaffordable for most households. And the toll is visible in declining food security.
FAO data shows that per capita meat consumption in Iran has fallen by 40% over the past decade, while dairy consumption has dropped by 30%.
A senior food industry official said last week that the average Iranian now consumes 7–10 kilograms of meat per year—consistent with FAO’s estimate of just over 8 kilograms, down from 12 kg just a few years ago.
“Meat consumption in Iran is deeply unequal—some eat nothing, while others manage 20 kilograms a year,” said Masoud Rasouli, secretary of the Meat Production and Packaging Association, adding that the global average is 32 kilograms.
The figures don’t lie: Iranians are not consuming too much—they’re getting by with less.
Contrary to the official line—and even public opinion—excess is not a national trait. It’s an alien concept to the majority chasing the basics.
Iranian prosecutors have expanded a ban on dog walking to more than 20 cities across the country, building on similar restrictions first introduced in the capital Tehran in 2019.
The ban has now spread to at least 25 cities, including Kermanshah, Ilam, Hamadan, Kerman, Boroujerd, Robat Karim, Lavasanat, and Golestan, according to a report by Tehran-based reformist-leaning outlet Faraz News on Sunday.
While no national legislation has been passed, judicial authorities are enforcing the ban through local directives and police orders, citing various articles of Iran’s Penal Code and Constitution.
These include Article 638 on public morality, Article 688 on threats to public health, and Article 40 of the Constitution, which prohibits harm to others.
Several prosecutors across various provinces announced the new bans over the weekend.
Kashmar, a city in northeastern Iran’s Razavi Khorasan province, is among the latest to implement the ban.
“Dog walking has been prohibited in this county in order to safeguard public hygiene and the physical and psychological safety of the public,” the city’s public prosecutor said on Sunday.
Khalkhal’s public prosecutor Mozaffar Rezaei in northwest Iran’s Ardabil province announced the ban came into effect on June 6. “Offenders will face consequences if they are seen walking dogs in parks, public spaces, or carrying them on their vehicles,” Rezaei said in remarks to Islamic Republic News Agency (ILNA) published Sunday.
"In addition to the financial and physical damages, religious rulings and cultural considerations must be taken into account, as this practice reflects the promotion of a Western lifestyle," he added.
In Ilam, western Iran, authorities imposed a dog walking ban on Saturday, warning that anyone seen walking dogs in parks, public areas, or transporting them in vehicles would face legal action. Police have also been instructed to impound vehicles involved in violations, according to provincial judicial chief Omran Ali Mohammadi.
In Isfahan, central Iran, the ban was announced last week by Mohammad Mousavian, the city’s public prosecutor who also ordered police to impound vehicles carrying dogs and shut down pet shops and unauthorized veterinary clinics.
A group of animal rights activists gathered outside the governor’s office in Isfahan on Sunday, calling for an end to what they described as municipal dog culling.