Iran International
Pressure on President Masoud Pezeshkian’s government continues to mount despite explicit support from Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who this week praised the president and his cabinet during a meeting in Tehran.
The latest move against Pezeshkian involves his labor minister Ahmad Maydari, whom hardline lawmakers seek to impeach despite the apparent reservations of the parliament’s presidium.
“The Majles will take no decisions without coordination with the pillars of the political system,” Abbas Goudarzi, a presidium spokesperson, told Tasnim News on Tuesday following a closed-door parliament session attended by Pezeshkian and his ministers.
The pillar of the system is widely understood to be a reference to Khamenei’s office.
That remark may reflect Khamenei’s own position, who has voiced frustration with repeated public attacks on the government, arguing that constant criticism only weakens the state.
At a Sunday meeting with the cabinet, he coupled that warning with unusually warm praise for Pezeshkian and Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref, even though he stopped short of citing tangible achievements.
'Solving no problem'
Maydari, however, remains a prime target. Hardliners have pressed for his removal for more than a year, citing the Labor Ministry’s failure to address strikes and protests by workers and pensioners.
Pezeshkian has resisted dismissals, arguing that “replacing individuals will solve no problem.” Still, Maydari has become emblematic of government shortcomings as economic grievances mount.
Goudarzi also revealed that impeachment motions are underway against two other ministers.
While he did not name them, outlets including Eghtesad Online have reported that Roads Minister Fereshteh Sadeq faces allegations of abusing her position for personal gain, while Energy Minister Abbas Aliabadi is under fire for blackouts and water shortages.
While MPs cite valid technical grounds, the impeachment drive reflects a deeper struggle inside Iran’s political system.
Much ado about power
Since the 1990s, hardliners have used parliamentary oversight to chip away at governments they view as unreliable. Pezeshkian’s weak political base and difficulty recruiting top technocrats have left him particularly exposed.
Despite Khamenei’s backing, the campaign against the government appears to be widening.
In recent days, hardline outlets have called for former President Hassan Rouhani to face trial for advocating change, while former foreign minister Javad Zarif has come under fire for suggesting dialogue with the United States.
For now, Khamenei’s intervention has shielded the government from collapse. But the impeachment moves reveal how hardliners are pressing their advantage, testing whether even the Supreme Leader’s explicit support can restrain them.
Supporters hailed the plan to feature renowned vocalist Homayoun Shajarian at Azadi (Freedom) Square as a rare chance for collective joy, while critics denounced it as a state ploy to deflect from the looming anniversary of Mahsa Amini’s death in custody.
Some urged Iranians to seize the event as a protest, while hardliners at home warned it would unleash unrest.
Shajarian, son of the late maestro Mohammad Reza Shajarian, announced on Instagram that after years of denials by the Ministry of Islamic Culture and Guidance, he had finally been granted permission to hold a free public concert.
He described it as the fulfillment of an impossible dream.
“This concert is neither for anyone nor at anyone’s request. I stood with the people during the war with Israel, and now I just want to lift their spirits,” he said.
Sudden storm
Critics were quick to react.
“The Homayoun Shajarian 'concert' is not a concert—it’s a government project … Those who take part in it (under any pretext) are without question agents of the regime and its foot soldiers,” one posted on X.
Ultra-hardliners claimed the state lacked the security capacity to manage such a gathering.
Supporters countered that the city had organized vast religious rallies like the “10-Kilometer Ghadir Feast” even during the turmoil following the recent 12-day war with Israel.
Sadegh Koushki, a politician close to the ultra-hardline Paydari Front, condemned the idea, calling it a show of numbers meant to “extort revolutionary people and the Leader.”
Filmmaker Abolghasem Talebi warned the event would become “a display of nudity” and a launchpad for protests.
“A free concert in Freedom Square means lawlessness,” he said. “First Shajarian, then others. Gradually, we’ll face a coup of public squares through nudity and unveiled women—with government permission.”
Cancellation
By Wednesday, Shajarian admitted his worst fear had come true: the concert would not take place, and his “impossible dream” would remain out of reach.
Tehran’s ultra-hardline mayor, Alireza Zakani, said security authorities had rejected the plan because of “time constraints” and lack of preparation, proposing to move it to the 12,000-seat Azadi Stadium.
Municipality officials claimed they were only informed days earlier, but the government countered that preparations had long been under discussion.
Government spokeswoman Fatemeh Mohajerani said the administration had supported the event from the start, asserting that "millions" attending would have strengthened national unity.
Administration public relations chief Ali Ahmadnia said Freedom Square remained the priority but the 100,000-seat Azadi Stadium could serve as a fallback.
Shajarian has reportedly ignored officials’ calls, and many supporters on social media say they will not attend if the concert is not held at Freedom Square.
‘Problem lies elsewhere’
The cancellation itself became a new battlefield, as critics highlighted what it revealed about the establishment’s insecurity.
Many believe the decision stemmed from fear that massive crowds would dwarf the regime’s own rallies in Freedom Square, which often struggle to fill even with free transport, food, and mandatory attendance.
Sociologist Mohammad Fazeli ridiculed the municipality’s claim of being unprepared: “Fine, give them two weeks! If they’re not lying, they can prepare. Otherwise, their problem lies elsewhere.”
Veteran reformist Abbas Abdi, writing in Ham Mihan, argued that those in power fear the people more than foreign invasion. “Domestic warmongers and hardline opposition [abroad] alike oppose peaceful, joyful gatherings,” he wrote.
“From the start, I doubted authorities would accept such a security risk,” political analyst Omid Memarian told Iran International.
“The cancellation proves the regime lacks self-confidence and reveals the depth of the rift between people and the state.”
