Mercedeh Shahinkar, who was shot in the eye during the Woman, Life, Freedom protests in 2022.
As the third anniversary of Mahsa Jina Amini’s death in Iranian morality police custody approaches, activist Mercedeh Shahinkar says only a mass uprising, not dialogue nor piecemeal reform, can win genuine change.
Amini died under circumstances which remain unexplained shortly after her arrest on Sept. 16, 2022, sparking a wave of protests nationwide dubbed the Woman, Life, Freedom movement which was ultimately quashed with deadly force.
Shahinkar and her mother joined a Tehran protest on Oct. 15, in which security forces shot her in the face with non-lethal munitions, leaving her blind in one eye.
Now living in exile in the United States, she believes the movement has moved far beyond opposition to the hijab mandated by Tehran's theocracy toward demanding the total downfall of the ruling system.
“Our youth were not killed and people like me were not blinded — many in one eye, many in both eyes, many raped and tortured in prisons — just to settle for superficial reforms,” Shahinkar told Iran International.
Her comments come as tensions fester inside Iran. According to Iran Human Rights, authorities executed Mehran Bahramian, a protester arrested during the 2022 demonstrations, just weeks before the anniversary.
Repression continued
Thousands of people in Iran face the risk of execution amid what Amnesty International on Wednesday called a deepening execution crisis.
The rights group said more than 800 people had been executed in 2025 so far, nearly double the pace of last year, and warned that dozens of other detainees linked to the protests remain at imminent risk of execution following what it describes as unfair trials and forced confessions.
Shahinkar says families of those killed or arrested during the unrest with whom she remains in touch tell her about renewed harassment, saying they have received summonses by security services to discourage public commemorations.
The protests, Shahinkar said, sparked visible social change but she believes the state allows it as a form of controlled freedom.
'We want evil rule gone'
A top Tehran decision-making body in May ordered the parliament not to enforce a contentious law mandating stricter hijab regulations.
“We see women singing in the streets, people taking relative freedoms. But they allow a bit of space only to avoid triggering another protest, Shahinkar said.
"We don’t want small freedoms meant to silence people. We want the Islamic Republic gone — its evil removed from our country."
Iranian-American psychotherapist Azadeh Afsahi, who works with survivors of torture through her nonprofit Iran House, says she hears this same shift from many Iranians she counsels.
“The definition of justice is not available when we talk with survivors, because we don’t know when they will see accountability. But what stands out is their willingness to fight, even after everything," Afsahi told Iran International.
Shahinkar insists that only mass resistance will make a difference.
“The Islamic Republic won’t fall through kindness or dancing. It takes anger and massive numbers in the streets — more than 50% of society, not just 20 or 30.”
Struggle goes on
Despite the risks, she says fear no longer holds her back.
“At first, I was terrified when I saw security forces. But over time, the fear disappeared… Even with one eye, we can celebrate freedom.”
The anniversary of Amini’s death is being marked by vigils and demonstrations abroad, while inside Iran, rights groups say authorities have tightened restrictions on gatherings. The United States and several European countries have issued statements honoring Amini’s memory and calling for accountability.
For Shahinkar, however, symbolic gestures abroad are not enough; she maintains that the future depends on Iranians themselves realizing their strength and carrying the struggle beyond hijab into a demand for systemic change.
The United States offered a reward of up to $15 million for information to disrupt financial networks of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including its Qods Force, the State Department said on Wednesday.
Washington said Chinese national Wang Shaoyun and Omani oil trader Mahmood Rashid Amur al Habsi worked with front companies in China, Oman and Turkey to sell sanctioned Iranian oil worth more than $100 million to Chinese state refineries, using the US financial system.
The State Department said the scheme helped fund the Guard’s overseas operations, including support for armed groups.
The Justice Department charged Wang and al Habsi in February with violating US sanctions and conspiring to launder money.
Al Habsi was also placed under Treasury sanctions in 2021, which blocked his assets in US jurisdiction and barred Americans from doing business with him.
The department said al Habsi and his partners used maritime vessels and front companies in Asia and the Middle East to transfer Iranian oil, while also relying on US banks to move money.
The indictment alleges al Habsi secured a $16.5 million loan in 2020 from US firms to buy an oil tanker later used to move sanctioned crude.
The FBI issued a federal arrest warrant for al Habsi in January and described him as having ties to Iran and China. The wanted poster lists him as 40 years old, about 5’11” and 170 pounds, and says he worked as an oil trader.
The State Department said the Revolutionary Guards, a US-designated foreign terrorist organization, has financed attacks globally and does not operate without revenue streams from illicit oil sales.
It urged people with information about Wang, al Habsi, or their networks to contact American authorities.
The United States on Wednesday urged Iran to take “immediate and concrete action” to meet its nuclear safeguards obligations, warning the IAEA board may need to act if Tehran fails to cooperate.
Howard Solomon, the acting US envoy in Vienna, told the IAEA’s Board of Governors that Iran had “ceased implementing its most basic and fundamental obligations under its safeguards agreement.” He said the board should be “extremely concerned by this near-complete and prolonged loss of required information and access.”
“Iran does not get to pick and choose when and how to implement its legally binding safeguards obligations,” Solomon said. “If Iran’s failure to cooperate with the IAEA continues … this Board will need to be prepared to take further action to hold Iran accountable.”
He noted the agreement announced on Tuesday in Cairo between IAEA chief Rafael Grossi and Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi but stressed: “Immediate and concrete action by Iran is both essential and urgent.”
EU backs Grossi but demands safeguards access
The European Union also welcomed the Cairo accord but said Iran must now deliver full cooperation. “We take positive note of the DG’s statement that this is a step in the right direction. We look forward to further details and to the immediate implementation of the agreement,” the EU said in a statement.
It warned that “the proliferation risk remains profound and urgent,” citing IAEA data that Iran’s stockpile of uranium enriched up to 60% had exceeded 440 kg — “more than 10 significant quantities.”
“We call on Iran to immediately enable the full resumption of the Agency’s in-field verification activities, the conduct of which must be in line with the standard safeguards practice and is therefore non-negotiable,” the EU said.
E3 warn of sanctions clock
The remarks came after France, Germany and Britain told the agency they were “alarmed” by the lack of clarity on Iran’s near-bomb-grade uranium stockpile. “It is not enough for Iran to make promises for tomorrow, we need to see evidence from Iran today,” the E3 said in an open letter.
The three countries last month triggered the UN snapback mechanism, which could restore global sanctions at the end of September unless a new Security Council resolution extends relief.
Grossi described the Cairo agreement as “a step in the right direction,” saying it covered inspections at all declared facilities, including those damaged in June’s strikes. Araghchi, however, said the deal “does not currently allow inspectors into nuclear sites,” and access would be defined only in later talks.
Elizabeth Tsurkov, an Israeli-Russian academic abducted in Baghdad in March 2023, was freed this week in what Iran’s Revolutionary Guards-affiliated Tasnim described as a prisoner exchange.
Tasnim reported on Thursday that Tsurkov was freed in exchange for two members of the “resistance,” a term used in Tehran to refer to allied armed groups. The agency’s Baghdad correspondent said one of those released was Imad Amehz, a Lebanese national who was seized by Israeli commandos in northern Lebanon last year.
Earlier Iraqi media had reported that Tsurkov was freed by security forces, without mentioning a swap. Neither Baghdad nor Washington has confirmed Tasnim’s account.
Tsurkov, a Princeton University PhD student and fellow at the New Lines Institute, disappeared in March 2023 while conducting field research in Baghdad. She was believed to have been held by Kata’ib Hezbollah, an Iran-backed Shiite militia accused of involvement in abductions and attacks on US and Israeli interests in Iraq.
The group denied responsibility, but an Iraqi official told Israel’s Channel 11 last year that Tsurkov was initially detained by Iraq’s intelligence service — or by individuals posing as its officers — before being transferred to Kata’ib Hezbollah.
Trump announces release
US President Donald Trump announced Tsurkov’s release on Tuesday, saying she was now “safely in the American Embassy in Iraq after being tortured for many months.” Her sister Emma confirmed the news and thanked the Trump administration for its efforts, noting her release came after 903 days in captivity.
Tsurkov’s fate drew wide international attention during her more than two years in captivity.
UN nuclear chief Rafael Grossi is “a Mossad agent” who should be arrested if he visits Tehran, Iranian lawmaker Javad Hosseini-Kia said on Wednesday, as Grossi and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi signed a cooperation deal in Cairo.
Parliament pushes back
Hosseini-Kia’s remarks reflect a broader backlash in parliament, where lawmakers say the Cairo accord ignores legislation suspending cooperation with the agency. National Security and Foreign Policy Commission member Mohammadreza Mohseni-Sani said inspectors have “no right” to enter Iran until nuclear sites damaged in June’s US and Israeli strikes are restored. “If the 30-day snapback period ends with sanctions restored, we will pursue and approve a plan to leave the NPT,” he warned.
Calls for tougher measures
Some lawmakers have gone further, arguing Iran should no longer limit itself to peaceful nuclear work. Ahmad Bakhshayesh, also on the security commission, told state media Iran should build a bomb because it has already “paid the costs” in the 12-day conflict. “We should have built it long ago,” he said. “We should have built it without leaving the NPT.”
Parliament is already considering a bill to withdraw from the treaty, though former nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi has said only Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei can make that decision.
Former officials urge caution
While hardliners demand confrontation, Salehi has struck a different note. The former atomic energy chief called the Cairo accord “positive and a step forward” but warned time is short. “Opportunities are like passing clouds,” he said. “The longer it takes, the more complicated the problem will become.”
‘Cursed agreement’ denounced
Even those who stop short of calling for a bomb or leaving the NPT have used sharp words. Hardline lawmaker Mahmoud Nabavian described Araghchi’s Cairo accord as a “cursed agreement.” On X, he accused Grossi of being “the spy and the cursed one, who caused the martyrdom of hundreds of our commanders, scientists and compatriots.”
Pattern of hostility toward Grossi
The latest attacks on Grossi build on threats voiced earlier this summer. In July, deputy judiciary chief Ali Mozaffari said Grossi could face trial in absentia for “deceptive actions and falsified reports” that Iran claims enabled strikes on nuclear facilities. At the time, a hardline newspaper even called for his execution.
Those comments drew condemnation from Britain, France and Germany, which expressed “full support” for Grossi and the IAEA. European powers last month triggered the snapback mechanism, giving Tehran until later in September to comply or face restored UN sanctions.
Government defends Cairo deal
Despite the criticism, Araghchi insists the Cairo agreement safeguards Iran’s interests. He said it “recognizes Iran’s legitimate security concerns” but “creates no access.” Any inspections, he explained, will only be discussed after Iran submits reports in later talks
France, Britain and the United Kingdom on Wednesday said they were alarmed by the lack of clarity on Iran's stockpile of near-bomb-grade uranium and that Tehran must show not claim if it wanted to avoid more sanctions.
"To put it bluntly, there up to this moment near zero IAEA oversight of Iran’s nuclear programme, and there are thousands of kilos of enriched uranium in Iran which the IAEA has not been able to verify for nearly three months," the European troika said.
"It is not enough for Iran to make promises for tomorrow, we need to see evidence from Iran today that demonstrates it is ready for a diplomatic solution that addresses the international community’s concerns."
"That starts by showing, not claiming, that it is meeting the fair and reasonable conditions set by the E3 for a Snapback extension," the statement read.
The E3's remarks came in the form of an open letter to the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is tasked with inspections of Iranian nuclear sites.
"Iran is obfuscating the status and location of this material from the international community, and Iran refused to allow the Agency to verify this stockpile," it added.
Sanctions loom
The three powers last month triggered the so-called "snapback" mechanism within a 2015 international nuclear deal to which they are party along with Iran, giving Tehran 30 days to comply with the agreement or face restored international sanctions.
IAEA chief Raphael Grossi inked a deal to pave a way forward on resuming cooperation with Iran alongside its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi at a ceremony in Cairo on Wednesday.
Grossi said the new deal covers inspections at all of Iran’s declared nuclear sites, including those hit by Israeli and US strikes in June, in what he called a step in the right direction toward restoring safeguards.
IAEA inspectors quit the country for safety reasons during the war but subsequently returned, though they have not resumed most of their duties.
Araghchi said on Wednesday the deal does not currently allow inspectors into nuclear sites and access would be discussed in future talks, adding the accord’s survival depends on Western powers refraining from restoring UN sanctions.
'Critical jucnture'
The E3 in its letter said Iran must swiftly engage in diplomacy to provide an extension to the sanctions and meet what it called its "fair and achievable" conditions: unconditional talks with Washington, compliance with safeguarding obligations and transparency on its uranium stockpile.
"We are at a critical juncture," it wrote. "The E3 have been clear to Iran and the international community that we remain committed to diplomacy."
"It is now up to Iran to quickly take concrete steps to demonstrate it is serious about finding a diplomatic solution and to engage meaningfully with our offer, which will remain on the table during the 30-day window before snapback takes effect," the E3 added.
Iran’s parliament has since adopted a law suspending cooperation, a serious obstacle to renewed cooperation.
'No guarantee'
The IAEA-Iran agreement on Tuesday appears to provide few concrete guarantees on when the watchdog's work can resume and may give little impetus to the European powers to take a softer line.
"I understand that the European view is that Tuesday’s agreement is very UNLIKELY to shift the plans on SnapBack," Wall Street Journal correspondent Laurence Norman wrote on X on Wednesday.
"The Europeans see the absence of clear timelines and deadlines as a major problem — effectively guaranteeing nothing."