Many experts and political commentators speaking to Iran's state-controlled media agree that Tehran now faces a United States with greater political coherence after Donald Trump’s election.
Abolfazl Fateh, former head of the state-owned Iranian Students News Agency (ISNA) and a prominent reformist figure in Iran, echoed this sentiment in a commentary for Etemad newspaper. He argued that Trump’s victory in the US election is likely to have far-reaching consequences for his opponents and increase concerns in many countries.
"Iran will need to come up with a new strategy as Trump, Netanyahu and their European and regional allies are likely to form a unified front," Fateh said, adding that "the Islamic Republic needs new plans and a new strategy to protect Iran's interests for the next two months before Trump takes office and for the next four years when he will be in the White House."
Fateh also argued that Trump is unlikely to spare his opponents and critics, both in the US and abroad, who may be entering a turbulent period. He carefully hinted without mentioning the Iranian government that some may need to reassess their positions on human rights policies.
Fateh further suggested that Trump’s victory could become the catalyst for a global political and military alliance among right-wing forces. He argued that this marks a new phase of globalization, with influential super-capitalists like Elon Musk ushering in an era focused on the digital economy, while Trump steers the direction of global politics and economics.
Fateh warned that Iran should be vigilant for a potential alliance between Trump and Arab and European states that have previously challenged Iran’s sovereignty over three Persian Gulf islands. He cautioned Iranian leaders, noting that Trump’s stance on Iran is rooted in a complex history.
In contrast, in an article titled "Trump's Comeback and Iran's Strategy," Etemad columnist Ali Ahangar commended Iranian officials for remaining unfazed by Trump’s return. He described Iran’s approach to the United States as “forward-looking.”
In a somewhat unusual argument, Ahangar suggested that Iran effectively blocked the United States from rejoining the 2015 nuclear deal during Biden’s administration, asserting that Iranian leaders had anticipated the November 5, 2024, election outcome. As a result, Iran maintained its uranium enrichment capabilities, while avoiding theJCPOA agreements automatic trigger mechanism for more sanctions.
Another indication that Iran was not caught off guard by Trump’s victory, Ahangar argued, is its leadership’s support for the rise of a "pacifist and moderate government" under Masoud Pezeshkian, who advocates for "negotiation and reconciliation." This move, he said, signaled to the world that Iran is forward-looking and open to dialogue.
Meanwhile, he emphasized that as the Middle East engages in a high-stakes struggle, it is Iran that plays the defining role. “Trump now has two options: pursue a dignified negotiation with a government seeking reconciliation or confront a Middle East racing at full speed toward nuclear armament.” Ahangar added, “Iran’s choice is one of negotiation while maintaining its dignity. Now it’s the United States’ turn to decide its path forward.”
In a separate commentary, foreign policy analyst Abdolreza Faraji-Rad reviewed Trump’s past relations with Iran, particularly his decision to withdraw from the nuclear deal, and concluded that Trump’s approach toward Iran will partly hinge on Iran’s strategy with the incoming US administration.
Faraji-Rad noted that Trump sought to initiate negotiations with Iran near the end of his term in 2020, but Iran was unprepared, especially following the killing of IRGC Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani. “Now, we have to wait and see how President Pezeshkian will approach the possibility of negotiations with Trump,” he wrote.
He added, “Pezeshkian has the potential to advance negotiations with Trump, but he must adapt his tactics to achieve relief from sanctions; otherwise, tensions will escalate. If Trump concludes that Iran is unwilling to negotiate, he will undoubtedly revert to his maximum pressure policy.”
However, Iran watchers understand that Pezeshkian’s actions ultimately depend on Supreme Leader Khamenei’s directives. Persuading Khamenei to endorse meaningful negotiations is likely more crucial than the specific approach Pezeshkian takes to move discussions forward.
These retirees, who include those who traveled from cities across Iran, say they have yet to receive 60 percent of their promised retirement benefits after 30 years of teaching.
During the demonstration, they chanted slogans such as “Incompetent minister, resign, resign,” “A nation has never seen such injustice,” “One fewer embezzlement, and our problem is solved,” and “Teacher, rise up to end discrimination.”
Images circulating on social media show that some retirees had slept in Tehran’s parks the night before, braving the cold to ensure they could attend the protest.
Reports from retiree and teacher networks indicate that the protest will continue on Monday, November 11, outside the Ministry of Education building in Tehran.
Last month the minister of education, Alireza Kazemi said that 50 percent of retiree payments would be allocated in the budget for the current and next fiscal years to address payment delays. However, these retired educators, some of whom have been waiting over a year post-retirement, have yet to receive their end-of-service bonuses.
This protest follows an earlier demonstration on October 22, when retirees gathered outside Tehran’s Social Security Organization.
Despite promises from the authorities, the retirees say that delays in their unpaid wages are eroding the value of their money, ILNA reported on Sunday.
Amid rising tensions with Israel, the Iranian rial last week plunged to a historic low of less than 1/10,000th of its pre-Islamic Republic value, trading at over 705,000 rials to the US dollar in Iran's free market
Amid soaring inflation over 40%, the rial’s continued decline has deepened Iran's economic crisis, leaving retirees struggling as their unpaid pensions lose value daily.
London-based Iranian labor rights activist Sattar Rahmani says the protests were entirely self-organized, with retirees independently mobilizing across cities in Iran, gathering outside the ministry in Tehran to once again voice their long-standing demands.
He sharply criticized Masoud Pezeshkian’s administration’s budget for next year as “entirely military-oriented,” emphasizing that funds have been allocated to security forces while essential sectors like education are neglected.
Pezeshkian unveiled next year’s budget recently, allocating nearly 20% of Iran’s oil export revenue—estimated to exceed $10 billion—exclusively to the Revolutionary Guard.
“There should be a budget set aside to ensure that the needs of education are met, so that teachers can be supported and don’t end up living below the poverty line,” Rahmani said in an interview with Iran International. He argued that Pezeshkian's administration is continuing the militaristic approach of Raisi’s government, leaving crucial societal needs, like education, unmet.
The militants attacked a watchtower in Sirkan area of Saravan near the Iranian-Pakistani border on Sunday evening, killing five members of the IRGC's Basij paramilitary forces, Mansour Bijar, the governor-general of Sistan-Baluchestan, told the state-run television.
Bijar stated that the victims were all local Baloch Sunni Muslims, while the insurgents were neither Baloch nor Sunni and had come from the neighboring country.
The victims have been identified as Abdulrahman Baluchzahi, Shahbakhsh Baluchzahi, Abdullah Baluchzahi, Wahid Baluchzahi, and Bashir Sepahi.
The IRGC's Ground Force announced in a statement that the assailants are at large, and the Revolutionary Guard has launched a manhunt.
Videos released by local news outlets like Haalvsh show IRGC surveillance drones flying over the city of Saravan to find the militants.
The attack came nine days after four militants were killed and eight others arrested in a joint operation by the IRGC and the Islamic Republic's intelligence ministry.
The November 1 operation was launched in response to an October 26 attack by Sunni Baloch group Jaish al-Adl in the city of Taftan in southeastern Iran, during which 10 Iranian border guards were killed.
The Jaish al-Adl attack was condemned by the United Nations Security Council as a "cowardly terrorist attack."
Iran's Sistan-Baluchestan province has been the site of numerous attacks attributed to Jaish al-Adl, a group known for its history of ambushes, bombings, and other violent operations, resulting in the deaths of both civilians and security personnel.
Jaish al-Adl advocates for an independent Balochistan that includes Baloch communities on both sides of the Iran-Pakistan border and has carried out numerous armed attacks in southeastern Iran.
In January, the IRGC announced it had carried out missile and drone strikes on the militant group’s bases within Pakistani territory. The rare cross-border offensive angered Pakistani officials and led Islamabad to respond with airstrikes on several sites in southeastern Iran.