Iranian Introduces Family Criteria In Faculty Recruitment
Being married will give Iranian academics an advantage in securing a teaching position, in line with the clerical government’s ideology, an Iranian official disclosed.
Being married will give Iranian academics an advantage in securing a teaching position, in line with the clerical government’s ideology, an Iranian official disclosed.
On Saturday, Mohammad-Ali Keinezhad, the head of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution's recruitment department outlined a scoring system where “having one child is worth 5 points, two children accumulate 11 points, and being married adds 5 points.”
The revelation follows an October announcement by an Iranian member of parliament regarding plans to allocate thousands of hectares of land to families for building houses, as an incentive for childbirth. As part of a broader population growth initiative, 200,000 domestically produced cars were distributed to “eligible individuals,” prompting questions about the fairness of distribution.
Iran is grappling with a demographic shift from a youthful to an aging population, presenting challenges for the nation. The decline in childbirth rates in recent decades has worried the ruling regime. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has called for efforts to increase the population from 85 million to as high as 150 million. In response, the parliament passed a law encouraging marriage and childbirth while prohibiting family planning options in public health services.
Critics argue that the population policy falls short of addressing economic hardships, with nearly 50% of the population living below the poverty line. Despite holding multiple jobs, many Iranians face ongoing challenges, raising concerns about the broader impact of the initiatives on the country's socio-economic landscape.
Living in exile in Europe, Karimi became one of the influential voices during anti-regime protests in 2022, using his influence on social media to defend young women and men, who were facing heavily armed vigilante and security forces.
For years, soccer spectators have been loudly chanting his name in stadiums, despite the authorities' disdain for him. His messages prove remarkably effective and influential during critical moments, to the extent that state television hosts have officially insulted him, labeling him as dishonorable and unworthy.
As an example of his style, on January 3, Karimi posted a twelve-word Persian tweet and received 103,000 likes, more than most famous Western politicians can ever dream of. It simply said, “Have you ever seen an honorable and decent person support this regime? I haven’t seen one.”
Ali Karimi, as a social phenomenon, prompts three questions for observers of Iran: How did a soccer player emerge as the voice of opposition in a country where professional soccer is state-owned? Why can't the government simply ignore him? And what are the underlying themes of Karimi's messages that have elevated him to a position of greater influence than even the most renowned artists, politicians, and religious authorities in the country?
Message: expressing the feelings of the main streets
Let's begin with the last question. Ali Karimi has attained an intuitive grasp of conveying the sentiments of ordinary people on the streets, in bazaars, taxis, shops, barbershops, gatherings, and even at funerals. His messages mirror the conversations that take place among people in these everyday settings, resonating like precious gems in their hands. Millions of individuals share and transmit his messages among themselves. He adeptly seizes the moment, creating opportunities for dialogue or progression, and hands the metaphorical ball to the people, allowing them to take shots at the government's policies.
Karimi transmits his messages, often in very brief format, vis social media to people in Iran. The impact that his messages and posts by other activists have among the people is the reason why Iran had blocked almost all global social media platforms. Islamic Republic’s leaders, including its 84-year-old ruler Ali Khamenei detest the Internet and messaging apps mainly for this reason.
Upgrade to the voice of the voiceless
Over a span of 15 years, Ali Karimi evolved into a prominent advocate for the non-elite population in opposition to the government. During the waves of the Green Movement protests in 2009, he was among the players who sported green wristbands during a match against South Korea. Renowned for his dazzling dribbling skills, Karimi enjoys popularity among Iranians and stands as an emblematic figure in Asian soccer. He has harnessed his popularity to engage in charitable endeavors and express his political dissent.
Karimi gradually transformed from a national soccer star into an influential figure in the national public spotlight. His open criticism of Mohammad Javad Zarif's anti-Israel positions, the ban on women entering stadiums, the role of IRGC commanders in managing soccer in the country, the downing of the Ukrainian airliner in 2020, and the nationwide protests in 2019 gradually made him a civil and political activist.
Government’s concern
The substantial number of followers, reposts, and likes garnered by Karimi's messages in the digital realm, coupled with the fact that there are over 60 million smartphones in the hands of Iranians, has granted him a platform that the government cannot disregard. With the official state radio and television news website receiving approximately just 124,000 monthly visitors, it is evident that authorities are apprehensive about Ali Karimi's influence, and they cannot afford to overlook him. His exceptional reach has prompted the propaganda machinery and government officials to issue threats against him.
Reza Naqipour, deputy head of the presidential office and the former Head of Security of the Football Federation threatened Ali Karimi with the hashtag of "Ruhullah Zam" (journalist, kidnapped in 2019 by IRGC intelligence and executed in 2020). "One day you will return the way that we like, not the way you like!" which means the threat of kidnapping and execution.
This week, Iran’s state television tried to discredit Karimi for a tweet he posted on January 3, following a deadly twin bombing in Kerman, where around 90 people visiting the gravesite of Qasem Soleimani were killed. Karimi said, "Go for free food and drink, but you will get a hard revenge," referring to regime’s policy of feeding people who attend its events. But what officials do not understand is that people receive Karimi's messages directly from him and pay little attention to the government television. Tens of thousands on social media came to his support by posting comments or liking and re-posting other messages.
Those responsible for defending the country and its borders “have strayed from their main responsibility” which has created suitable grounds for terrorists, Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh, the conservative former head of the parliament's National Security and Foreign Relations Committee, told the reformist Etemad newspaper about the January 3 terrorist attack in Kerman that killed at least 90 and injured over 200.
“What happened is that the enemies of Iran and Martyr Soleimani were much more prepared than the security officials inside Iran. While the relevant officials in Kerman were preoccupied with propaganda work, the enemies were doing operational planning,” he added.
“There is very high possibility of incidents like this given that Iran has many enemies,” he said while pointing out that local authorities had also failed in planning for Soleimani’s burial ceremony in January 2020 when a stampede killed around sixty participants and injured over two hundred others.
In a statement posted on its affiliate Telegram channels Thursday, a branch of the Islamic State (ISIS or Daesh) in Afghanistan claimed responsibility for the explosions. The statement named two suicide bombers as Omar Al-Mohed and Saif Allah Al-Mujahid and said they had detonated their explosive belts in the middle of the crowd, “resulting in the death and injury of more than 300 polytheists”.
Earlier Thursday, the official news agency IRNA had cited an informed source as saying that conclusive evidence, including CCTV footage, indicated that suicide bombing was responsible for the first of the two explosions.
Calling the Iranian government “inefficient and corrupt”, Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, director of the Norway-based Iran Human Rights (IRH) criticized the regime for using its resources to persecute people for hijab and dissent instead of guaranteeing their security and warned about an increase in “executions and repression of citizens under the pretext of this terrorist act as in the past.”
Ahmad Zahedi-Langaroudi, a prominent journalist and member of Iran's banned Writers’ Association, in a tweet said the government should be held responsible irrespective of who perpetrated the terrorist attack. "They have employed numerous audacious mercenaries to oppress women. Both provincial and national security and military officials have not only failed to take responsibility, apologize, or resign, but they have also been boasting and deflecting responsibility!" he wrote.
Many on social media accused Iran's own security and intelligence agencies of perpetrating the bombing to buy sympathy for the regime. They claimed Soleimani’s own family and high-ranking Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) officials were warned not to attend the ceremony.
“The government should have at least explained the absence of Qassem Soleimani's family and IRGC commanders at the Kerman ceremony,” Turkmen Sahra, an account dedicated to Iran's Sunni Turkmen region tweeted. “The Kerman scenario is an excuse for executions and new arrests.’
Citing various scenarios after the bombing, an IRGC-linked news agency, Tasnim, had claimed Wednesday that the two bombs in handbags or backpacks that tore through the crowd 300 meters apart were hidden inside trash cans and remotely detonated.
Hardliners including some lawmakers and Kayhan daily, known as the voice of Khamenei, had pointed fingers at Israel while others held the Taliban, and various ethnic militants such as the Baluchi Jundullah responsible for the attack.
In a brief message Wednesday, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei condemned the attack and threatened a hard response and punishment. Accordingly, banners have sprung up all over Iranian cities promising “hard revenge”.
